Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Oct;32(5):658-663.
doi: 10.1177/0884533617706894. Epub 2017 May 23.

Association Between Nutrition Status and Survival in Elderly Patients With Colorectal Cancer

Affiliations

Association Between Nutrition Status and Survival in Elderly Patients With Colorectal Cancer

Katia Barao et al. Nutr Clin Pract. 2017 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Aging patients with cancer have a higher risk of mortality and treatment-associated morbidity than younger patients. Nutrition status may play an important role in cancer mortality. We aimed to evaluate the survival time of elderly patients with colorectal cancer and its association with body mass index (BMI), the patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA), and phase angle (PA).

Materials and methods: BMI, PG-SGA, and PA were determined for all patients (n = 250) at first assessment.

Results: Seventy-one (28.4%) patients were in active oncologic treatment (group 1) and 179 (71.6%) were in remission (group 2). At the time of the analysis, 73 (29.2%) patients had died and 177 (70.8%) were censored. The mean (standard deviation) age was 70.9 (7.49) years; 17.2% were undernourished, 56% normal weight, and 26.8% were overweight. According to the PG-SGA, 35.2% of patients needed some nutrition intervention and 4.4% needed it urgently. The mean PA was 4.94 ± 1°. PG-SGA, tumor stage, and PA differed significantly ( P < .001) between the groups; BMI did not ( P = .459). Severe malnutrition (PG-SGA C), compared with PG-SGA A, was associated with a relative hazard of death of 12.04 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.43-42.19, P < .001). PA >5° was associated with better prognosis: a relative hazard of 0.456 (95% CI, 0.263-0.792; P < .005).

Conclusion: Among elderly patients with colorectal cancer, PA and PG-SGA were prognosis factors. PA >5° was associated with best survival and PG-SGA C with worst survival.

Keywords: PG-SGA; bioelectrical impedance; colorectal cancer; nutrition assessment; nutritional status; phase angle; survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources