Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jun;13(3):418-429.
doi: 10.1007/s12015-017-9737-1.

Progress and Future Prospectives in Skin-on-Chip Development with Emphasis on the use of Different Cell Types and Technical Challenges

Affiliations
Review

Progress and Future Prospectives in Skin-on-Chip Development with Emphasis on the use of Different Cell Types and Technical Challenges

Lenie J van den Broek et al. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2017 Jun.

Abstract

Understanding the healthy and diseased state of skin is important in many areas of basic and applied research. Although the field of skin tissue engineering has advanced greatly over the last years, current in vitro skin models still do not mimic the complexity of the human skin. Skin-on-chip and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) might be key technologies to improve in vitro skin models. This review summarizes the state of the art of in vitro skin models with regard to cell sources (primary, cell line, iPSC) and microfluidic devices. It can be concluded that iPSC have the potential to be differentiated into many kinds of immunologically matched cells and skin-on-chip technology might lead to more physiologically relevant skin models due to the controlled environment, possible exchange of immune cells, and an increased barrier function. Therefore the combination of iPSC and skin-on-chip is expected to lead to superior healthy and diseased in vitro skin models.

Keywords: Cell line; In vitro; Induced pluripotent stem cell; Microfluidics; Organ-on-chip; Organotypic model; Skin; Skin equivalent; Skin model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Lenie J. van den Broek, Lambert I. J. C. Bergers and Christianne M. A. Reijnders have no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this manuscript. Prof. Dr. S. Gibbs is co-founder of A-SKIN Netherland BV, which is a VUmc skin tissue engineering spin off company (SME).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The combination of a microfluidic device (migration and immigration of immune cells and controlled environment) and iPSCs (all skin cells eg. fibroblasts, keratinocytes, melanocytes, dermal papillae cells, endothelial cells, adipocytes from same iPSC donor so no rejection) form the basis for the next generation skin models. Such an immunocompetent in vivo-like skin model containing three skin layers (epidermis, dermis and adipose tissue) and appendages would be an alternative to animal testing in toxicology assessment and drug testing

References

    1. Seok J, Warren HS, Cuenca AG, et al. Genomic responses in mouse models poorly mimic human inflammatory diseases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2013;110(9):3507–3512. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1222878110. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mak IW, Evaniew N, Ghert M. Lost in translation: Animal models and clinical trials in cancer treatment. American Journal of Translational Research. 2014;6(2):114–118. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cosmetics Europe. (2004) European Union Cosmetics Directive 76/768/EEC - Consolidated version (https://www.cosmeticseurope.eu/publications-cosmetics-europe-association...)
    1. Eungdamrong NJ, Higgins C, Guo Z, et al. Challenges and promises in modeling dermatologic disorders with bioengineered skin. Experimental Biology and Medicine (Maywood, N.J.) 2014;239(9):1215–1224. doi: 10.1177/1535370214538747. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bergers LI, Reijnders CM, Van Den Broek LJ, et al. Immune-competent human skin disease models. Drug Discovery Today. 2016;21(9):1479–1488. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2016.05.008. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types