Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul-Aug;43(4):698-703.
doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0678.

Effects of body mass index on the outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Affiliations

Effects of body mass index on the outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Cemal Selcuk Isoglu et al. Int Braz J Urol. 2017 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the the effect of body mass index (BMI) on PNL results and complications with a large number of patients.

Materials and methods: A total of 958 patients were included in the study, who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy in our clinic between 2008 and 2015. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to their body mass index. Patients with a BMI < 30 kg/m2 were classified as group 1 (n:676) and patients with a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 were classified as group 2 (n:282). Achieving stone-free status or having residual stones of ≤ 4 mm were considered as operational success.

Results: The mean age was 47.9 years for group 1 and 48.9 years for group 2 patients. At postoperative first month CT analysis, residual stone was not observed in 466 patients (69%) of group 1 and 20 (72%) patients of group 2. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of stone-free status (p=0.348). There was no significant difference between two groups complications. Also, there was no difference between the groups for requiring additional intervention (p=0.924). No other complications were observed in the patients.

Conclusions: BMI does not affect the outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy as well as complication rate.

Keywords: Body Mass Index; Calculi; Nephrostomy, Percutaneous.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Calvert RC, Burgess NA. Urolithiasis and obesity: metabolic and technical considerations. Curr Opin Urol. 2005;15:113–117. - PubMed
    1. Semins MJ, Shore AD, Makary MA, Magnuson T, Johns R, Matlaga BR. The association of increasing body mass index and kidney stone disease. J Urol. 2010;183:571–575. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Türk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, Sarica V, Skolarikos A, Straub M, et al. Guidelines on Urolithiasis. European Association of Urology; 2015. pp. 16–24.
    1. Koo BC, Burtt G, Burgess NA. Percutaneous stone surgery in the obese: outcome stratified according to body mass index. BJU Int. 2004;93:1296–1299. - PubMed
    1. Alyami FA, Skinner TA, Norman RW. Impact of body mass index on clinical outcomes associated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Can Urol Assoc J. 2013;7:E197–E201. - PMC - PubMed