Comparing Health Care Resource Use between Implant and Autologous Reconstruction of the Irradiated Breast: A National Claims-Based Assessment
- PMID: 28538545
- PMCID: PMC5448285
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003336
Comparing Health Care Resource Use between Implant and Autologous Reconstruction of the Irradiated Breast: A National Claims-Based Assessment
Abstract
Background: In the debate on reconstruction of the irradiated breast, there is little information on associated health care resource use. Nationwide data were used to examine health care resource use associated with implant and autologous reconstruction. It was hypothesized that failure rates would contribute the most to higher average cumulative cost with either reconstruction method.
Methods: From the 2009 to 2013 MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database, irradiated breast cancer patients who underwent implant or autologous reconstruction were selected. In a 24-month follow-up period, the cumulative costs of health care services used were tallied and described. Regression models stratified by reconstruction method were then used to estimate the influence of failure on cumulative cost of reconstruction.
Results: There were 2964 study patients. Most (78 percent) underwent implant reconstruction. The unadjusted mean costs for implant and autologous reconstructions were $22,868 and $30,527, respectively. Thirty-two percent of implant reconstructions failed, compared with 5 percent of autologous cases. Twelve percent of the implant reconstructions had two or more failures and required subsequent autologous reconstruction. The cost of implant reconstruction failure requiring a flap was $47,214, and the cost for autologous failures was $48,344. In aggregate, failures constituted more than 20 percent of the cumulative costs of implant reconstruction compared with less than 5 percent for autologous reconstruction.
Conclusions: More than one in 10 patients who had implant reconstruction in the setting of radiation therapy to the breast eventually required a flap for failure. These findings make a case for autologous reconstruction being primarily considered in irradiated patients who have this option available.
Conflict of interest statement
Financial interest: No authors have financial interests to declare.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Autologous Breast Reconstruction versus Implant-Based Reconstruction: How Do Long-Term Costs and Health Care Use Compare?Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Feb;145(2):303-311. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006422. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020. PMID: 31985608
-
Autologous Breast Reconstruction after Failed Implant-Based Reconstruction: Evaluation of Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Feb;143(2):373-379. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005197. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019. PMID: 30688876 Free PMC article.
-
Reconstruction of the Irradiated Breast: A National Claims-Based Assessment of Postoperative Morbidity.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Apr;139(4):783-792. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003168. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017. PMID: 28002254 Free PMC article.
-
Economic analysis and review of the literature on implant-based breast reconstruction with and without the use of the acellular dermal matrix.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013 Dec;37(6):1194-201. doi: 10.1007/s00266-013-0213-2. Epub 2013 Oct 3. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013. PMID: 24091489 Review.
-
Trends in tertiary breast reconstruction: literature review and single centre experience.Breast. 2013 Apr;22(2):173-178. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Jul 11. Breast. 2013. PMID: 22795362 Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Preoperative Irradiation on Early Complications in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction.Arch Plast Surg. 2024 Aug 6;51(5):466-473. doi: 10.1055/a-2358-8864. eCollection 2024 Sep. Arch Plast Surg. 2024. PMID: 39346005 Free PMC article.
-
Teaching Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction-A Retrospective Cohort Study.J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 14;10(24):5875. doi: 10.3390/jcm10245875. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 34945171 Free PMC article.
-
The Role of the Abdominal Perforator Exchange (APEX) Technique in the Perforator Selection Algorithm for Delayed Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) Flap Breast Reconstruction.J Clin Med. 2025 May 7;14(9):3256. doi: 10.3390/jcm14093256. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40364286 Free PMC article.
-
Implants versus autologous tissue flaps for breast reconstruction following mastectomy.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 31;10(10):CD013821. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013821.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 39479986
-
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Prediction of Surgical Complications: Current State, Applications, and Implications.Am Surg. 2023 Jan;89(1):25-30. doi: 10.1177/00031348221101488. Epub 2022 May 13. Am Surg. 2023. PMID: 35562124 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Yao K, Liederbach E, Lutfi W, et al. Increased utilization of postmastectomy radiotherapy in the United States from 2003 to 2011 in patients with one to three tumor positive nodes. J Surg Oncol. 2015;112(8):809–814. - PubMed
-
- Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Mehrara BJ, et al. A paradigm shift in U.S. breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(1):15–23. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical