Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Mar-Apr;92(2):212-216.
doi: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20175273.

Efficacy and safety of superficial chemical peeling in treatment of active acne vulgaris

Affiliations
Review

Efficacy and safety of superficial chemical peeling in treatment of active acne vulgaris

Hassanain Al-Talib et al. An Bras Dermatol. 2017 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

Acne vulgaris is an extremely common condition affecting the pilosebaceous unit of the skin and characterized by presence of comedones, papules, pustules, nodules, cysts, which might result in permanent scars. Acne vulgaris commonly involve adolescents and young age groups. Active acne vulgaris is usually associated with several complications like hyper or hypopigmentation, scar formation and skin disfigurement. Previous studies have targeted the efficiency and safety of local and systemic agents in the treatment of active acne vulgaris. Superficial chemical peeling is a skin-wounding procedure which might cause some potentially undesirable adverse events. This study was conducted to review the efficacy and safety of superficial chemical peeling in the treatment of active acne vulgaris. It is a structured review of an earlier seven articles meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The clinical assessments were based on pretreatment and post-treatment comparisons and the role of superficial chemical peeling in reduction of papules, pustules and comedones in active acne vulgaris. This study showed that almost all patients tolerated well the chemical peeling procedures despite a mild discomfort, burning, irritation and erythema have been reported; also the incidence of major adverse events was very low and easily manageable. In conclusion, chemical peeling with glycolic acid is a well-tolerated and safe treatment modality in active acne vulgaris while salicylic acid peels is a more convenient for treatment of darker skin patients and it showed significant and earlier improvement than glycolic acid.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: none.

References

    1. Thiboutot D, Gollnick H, Bettoli V, Dreno B, Kang S, Leyden JJ, et al. New insights into the management of acne: an update from the Global Alliance to Improve Outcomes in Acne group. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;60:S1–50. - PubMed
    1. Roberts WE. Chemical peeling in ethnic/dark skin. Dermatol Ther. 2004;17:196–205. - PubMed
    1. Roberts JA, Uetz GW. Chemical signaling in a wolf spider: a test of ethospecies discrimination. J Chem Ecol. 2004;30:1271–1284. - PubMed
    1. Markowitz PI. USA patent 6,120,756. Iinventor Topical anionic salicylate for disorders of the skin. 2000
    1. Nast A, Bayerl C, Borelli C, Degitz K, Dirschka T, Erdmann R, et al. S2k-guideline for therapy of acne. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2010;8(Suppl 2):s1–59. - PubMed