Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Apr;9(Suppl 4):S327-S332.
doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.03.77.

Techniques for intraoperative graft assessment in coronary artery bypass surgery

Affiliations
Review

Techniques for intraoperative graft assessment in coronary artery bypass surgery

Lucas B Ohmes et al. J Thorac Dis. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Early graft patency is a major determinant of morbidity and mortality following coronary artery bypass surgery. Long-term graft failure is caused by intimal hyperplasia and atherosclerosis, while early failure, especially in the first year, has been attributed, in part, to surgical error. The need for intraoperative graft evaluation is paramount to determine need for revision and ensure future functioning grafts. Transit time flowmetry (TTFM) is the most commonly used intraoperative modality, however, only about 20% of cardiac surgeons in North America use TTFM. When combined with high resolution epicardial ultrasonography, TTFM provides high diagnostic yield. Fluorescence imaging can provide excellent visualization of the coronary and graft vasculature; however, data on this subject is limited. We herein examine the literature and discuss the available techniques for graft assessment along with their limitations.

Keywords: Fluorescence imaging coronary artery bypass surgery; intraoperative graft assessment; intraoperative imaging; transit time flowmetry (TTFM).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

    1. Head SJ, Kieser TM, Falk V, et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting: Part 1--the evolution over the first 50 years. Eur Heart J 2013;34:2862-72. 10.1093/eurheartj/eht330 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Head SJ, Börgermann J, Osnabrugge RLJ, et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting: Part 2--optimizing outcomes and future prospects. Eur Heart J 2013;34:2873-86. 10.1093/eurheartj/eht284 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Taggart DP. Biochemical assessment of myocardial injury after cardiac surgery: effects of a platelet activating factor antagonist, bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts, and coronary endarterectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;120:651-9. 10.1067/mtc.2000.106325 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kieser TM, Rose S, Kowalewski R, et al. Transit-time flow predicts outcomes in coronary artery bypass graft patients: a series of 1000 consecutive arterial grafts. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010;38:155-62. 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.01.026 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hess CN, Lopes RD, Gibson CM, et al. Saphenous vein graft failure after coronary artery bypass surgery: insights from PREVENT IV. Circulation 2014;130:1445-51. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.008193 - DOI - PMC - PubMed