Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jun;120(6):461-471.
doi: 10.1007/s00113-017-0361-y.

[The significance of biofilm for the treatment of infections in orthopedic surgery : 2017 Update]

[Article in German]
Affiliations
Review

[The significance of biofilm for the treatment of infections in orthopedic surgery : 2017 Update]

[Article in German]
C Scheuermann-Poley et al. Unfallchirurg. 2017 Jun.

Abstract

Background: The increase in endoprosthetic and osteosynthetic surgical treatment is associated with a simultaneous increase in implant-associated infections (surgical site infections, SSI). Biofilms appear to play a significant role in the diagnosis and treatment of these infections and heavily contaminated wounds. This article aims to provide a current overview of biofilm and its relevance in orthopedic surgery.

Materials and methods: A computer-assisted literature search of MedLine (PubMed) was performed using key word combinations with "biofilm" (as of March 2017).

Results: Biofilm, a polymicrobial organization and life form surrounded by a polysaccharide matrix, refers to an adaptation strategy of bacteria in unfavorable living conditions (e. g. under antibiotic therapy). Biofilms can develop after 6 h in highly contaminated wounds. In acute and chronic infections, biofilms can occur in 30-80 % of the cases. Only planktonic bacteria (high metabolic activity, cultivable) can be detected in standard microbiological cultures, biofilms, however, cannot. Molecular microscopic methods, such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), enable the detection of bacteria in biofilms. The core concepts of anti-biofilm therapy include the prevention of biofilm and early surgical debridement, followed by the local and/or systemic administration of antibiotics as well as the local application of antiseptics.

Conclusions: The development of biofilm should be anticipated in strongly contaminated wounds as well as in acute and chronic infection sites. The best strategy to combat biofilms is to prevent their development. Standard microbiological culture methods do not enable the detection of biofilm. Therefore, the implementation of molecular biological detection methods (z. B. FISH) is important. Further anti-biofilm strategies are being investigated experimentally, but there are no real options for clinical use as of yet.

Keywords: Antiseptic agents; Debridement; Fluorescence in situ hybridization; Implant-associated infections; Negative pressure wound therapy instillation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Infect Immun. 2014 Jan;82(1):83-91 - PubMed
    1. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006 Dec;58(6):1287-90 - PubMed
    1. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014 Apr;27(2):302-45 - PubMed
    1. Wound Repair Regen. 2008 Jan-Feb;16(1):23-9 - PubMed
    1. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2016 Oct 25;:null - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources