Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May 24;12(5):e0178149.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178149. eCollection 2017.

Parenting styles, feeding styles and food-related parenting practices in relation to toddlers' eating styles: A cluster-analytic approach

Affiliations

Parenting styles, feeding styles and food-related parenting practices in relation to toddlers' eating styles: A cluster-analytic approach

Klazine van der Horst et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Introduction: Toddlers' eating behaviors are influenced by the way parents interact with their children. The objective of this study was to explore how five major constructs of general parenting behavior cluster in parents of toddlers. These parenting clusters were further explored to see how they differed in the use of feeding strategies (i.e. feeding styles and food parenting practices) and by reported child eating styles.

Methods: An online survey with 1005 mothers/caregivers (legal guardians) with at least one child between 12 and 36 months old was conducted in the United States in 2012, assessing general parenting behavior, feeding style, food parenting practices and the child eating styles.

Results: A three cluster solution of parenting style was found and clusters were labelled as overprotective/supervising, authoritarian, and authoritative. The clusters differed in terms of general parenting behaviors. Both overprotective and authoritative clusters showed high scores on structure, behavioral control, and nurturance. The overprotective cluster scored high on overprotection. The 'authoritarian' cluster showed lowest levels of nurturance, structure and behavioral control. Overprotective and authoritative parents showed very similar patterns in the use of food parenting practices, e.g. monitoring food intake, modeling, and promoting healthy food intake and availability at home. Overprotective parents also reported higher use of pressure to eat and involvement. Authoritarian parents reported high use of giving the child control over their food behaviors, emotion regulation, using food as a reward, and controlling food intake for weight control. Children's eating styles did not largely vary by parenting cluster.

Conclusion: This study showed that a relatively new parenting style of overprotection is relevant for children's eating behaviors. Overprotective parents reported food parenting practices that are known to be beneficial for children's food intake, such as modelling healthy food intake, as well as more unfavorable practices such as pressure. Longitudinal data on parenting practices and their relation to healthy eating in children is needed to inform communication and interventions for parents, reinforcing key feeding strategies which have positive effects on child eating behaviors and addressing parenting styles that have unintended negative effects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: One of the authors [KVDH] is employed at Nestec Ltd. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials that were used for this publication. The author who is a Nestec Ltd. employee has no conflicts of interest of any type with respect to this manuscript. The opinions expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or recommendations of their respective affiliations.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Representation of the three clusters for the main constructs of parenting stylea.
a Mean scores (standard deviation) on the main constructs for the 3 clusters (cluster 1 = C1, cluster 2 = C2, cluster 3 = C3) were as follows: Structure: C1 = 4.39 (0.30) C2 = 3.28 (0.28) C3 = 3.97 (0.33); Behavioral Control: C1 = 4.76 (0.22), C2 = 3.41 (0.41), C3 = 4.32 (.31); Overprotection: C1 = 3.36 (.57), C2 = 3.08 (.43), C3 = 2.61 (.62); Coercive control: C1 = 2.93 (.72), C2 = 3.05 (.43), C3 = 2.71 (.62); Nurturance: C1 = 4.73 (.19), C2 = 3.47 (.37), C3 = 4.43 (.29).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dovey TM, Staples PA, Gibson EL, Halford JC. Food neophobia and 'picky/fussy' eating in children: a review. Appetite. 2008;50(2–3):181–93. 10.1016/j.appet.2007.09.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Faith MS, Scanlon KS, Birch LL, Francis LA, Sherry B. Parent-child feeding strategies and their relationships to child eating and weight status. Obes Res. 2004;12(11):1711–22. 10.1038/oby.2004.212 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ventura AK, Birch LL. Does parenting affect children's eating and weight status? Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008;5:15 Epub 2008/03/19. 10.1186/1479-5868-5-15 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fisher JO, Birch LL. Restricting access to palatable foods affects children's behavioral response, food selection, and intake. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69(6):1264–72. - PubMed
    1. Fisher JO, Birch LL. Restricting access to foods and children's eating. Appetite. 1999;32(3):405–19. 10.1006/appe.1999.0231 - DOI - PubMed