Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb;128(2):473-481.
doi: 10.1002/lary.26669. Epub 2017 May 23.

Acoustic plus electric speech processing: Long-term results

Affiliations

Acoustic plus electric speech processing: Long-term results

Bruce J Gantz et al. Laryngoscope. 2018 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: Few studies have investigated the stability of residual hearing and speech perception outcomes in individuals who were implanted with a shorter electrode device.

Study design: Longitudinal, single-subject design.

Methods: Fifty subjects who received a Nucleus Hybrid (Cochlear, Sydney, Australia) short electrode cochlear implant (CI) and had a minimum of 2 years (and up to 15 years) of postoperative longitudinal experience were included in this study. Twenty-three subjects received a Nucleus Hybrid S8 (S8); 14 subjects received a Nucleus Hybrid L24 (L24); and 13 received a Nucleus Hybrid S12 (S12). Audiometric thresholds and consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) words were collected pre- and postoperatively for up to 15 years for the S8 subjects and for up to 7 years for the S12 and L24 subjects. AzBio Sentences in multi-talker babble was collected for up to 7 years on the S12 and L24 subjects.

Results: Longitudinally, 83% of the S8 subjects, 92% of the S12 subjects, and 86% of the L24 subjects maintained a functional hearing pure-tone average (PTA) (125-500 Hz). Predicted change using a piecewise linear mixed model in PTA over time showed a postoperative linear decrease in hearing for each group until 0.5 years, after which the PTA stabilizes and is maintained. The averaged individual data for CNC and AzBio sentences show a significant improvement in scores by 0.25 to 0.5 years postimplantation, after which scores start to reach their maximum.

Conclusion: This long-term study demonstrates that acoustic-electric processing hearing and improvement in speech understanding in quiet and in noise can be accomplished and sustained for many years with a short electrode CI.

Level of evidence: 2C. Laryngoscope, 128:473-481, 2018.

Keywords: Hybrid; cochlear implant; long-term; residual hearing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no other financial or conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Individual and modeled longitudinal hearing preservation using a three-frequency pure-tone-average (PTA) from 125 to 500 Hz. Panel A shows PTAs for the S8 subjects; Panel B for the S12 subjects; and Panel C for the L24 subjects. Panel D shows the modeled PTAs for each of the Hybrid groups over time. The light gray dashed line in each of the panels represents the threshold that is considered to be non-functional hearing. The black dashed line represents the averaged PTA longitudinally.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Individual most recent post-operative thresholds from 125–500 Hz. Panel A shows thresholds for the S8 subjects; Panel B for the S12 subjects; and Panel C for the L24 subjects. Panel D shows the averaged preoperative and most recent postoperative thresholds from 125–500 Hz for each of the Hybrid groups.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Individual and modeled longitudinal speech perception outcomes for CNC words in the Combined listening condition (bilateral hearing aids and the CI). Panel A shows scores for the S8 subjects; Panel B for the S12 subjects; and Panel C shows for the L24 subjects. The gray dashed lines within each panel show the outcomes for the subjects that lost their residual hearing. These patients were tested in the Bimodal listening condition (the CI reprogrammed to provide both low- and high-frequency information in one ear and hearing aid in the contralateral ear). The black dashed line within Panels A-C show the averaged outcomes at each time point. Panel D shows the modeled preoperative CNC score using bilateral hearing aids and longitudinally in the Combined condition following implantation for each of the subjects in the Hybrid groups.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Individual and modeled longitudinal speech perception outcomes for AzBio Sentences in Noise in the Combined listening condition. Panel A shows scores for the S12 subjects and Panel B shows scores for the L24 subjects. The gray dashed lines within each panel show the outcomes for the subjects that lost their residual hearing. These patients were tested in the bimodal condition. The black dashed line within Panel A and B show the averaged outcomes at each time point.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Averaged CNC performance for Hybrid users (N=43) in the Combined condition, Hybrid subjects who lost hearing in the Bimodal condition (N=7), standard-length electrode bimodal users (N=28), simultaneous bilateral standard-length electrode users (N=33), and standard-length electrode unilateral users (n=33).

References

    1. Rizer FM, Arkis PN, Lippy WH, Schuring AG. A postoperative audiometric evaluation of cochlear implant patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1988 Mar;98(3):203–206. - PubMed
    1. van Dijk JE, van Olphen AF, Langereis MC, Mens LH, Brokx JP, Smoorenburg GF. Predictors of cochlear implant performance. Audiology. 1999 Mar-Apr;38(2):109–116. - PubMed
    1. Hodges AV, Schloffman J, Balkany T. Conservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation. The American Journal of Otology. 1997 Mar;18(2):179–183. - PubMed
    1. Skarzynski H, Lorens A, D’Haese P, et al. Preservation of residual hearing in children and post-lingually deafened adults after cochlear implantation: an initial study. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2002 Jul-Aug;64(4):247–253. - PubMed
    1. Gantz BJ, Dunn C, Oleson J, Hansen M, Parkinson A, Turner C. Multicenter clinical trial of the Nucleus Hybrid S8 cochlear implant: Final outcomes. Laryngoscope. 2016 Apr;126(4):962–973. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types