Acoustic plus electric speech processing: Long-term results
- PMID: 28543270
- PMCID: PMC5700847
- DOI: 10.1002/lary.26669
Acoustic plus electric speech processing: Long-term results
Abstract
Objective: Few studies have investigated the stability of residual hearing and speech perception outcomes in individuals who were implanted with a shorter electrode device.
Study design: Longitudinal, single-subject design.
Methods: Fifty subjects who received a Nucleus Hybrid (Cochlear, Sydney, Australia) short electrode cochlear implant (CI) and had a minimum of 2 years (and up to 15 years) of postoperative longitudinal experience were included in this study. Twenty-three subjects received a Nucleus Hybrid S8 (S8); 14 subjects received a Nucleus Hybrid L24 (L24); and 13 received a Nucleus Hybrid S12 (S12). Audiometric thresholds and consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) words were collected pre- and postoperatively for up to 15 years for the S8 subjects and for up to 7 years for the S12 and L24 subjects. AzBio Sentences in multi-talker babble was collected for up to 7 years on the S12 and L24 subjects.
Results: Longitudinally, 83% of the S8 subjects, 92% of the S12 subjects, and 86% of the L24 subjects maintained a functional hearing pure-tone average (PTA) (125-500 Hz). Predicted change using a piecewise linear mixed model in PTA over time showed a postoperative linear decrease in hearing for each group until 0.5 years, after which the PTA stabilizes and is maintained. The averaged individual data for CNC and AzBio sentences show a significant improvement in scores by 0.25 to 0.5 years postimplantation, after which scores start to reach their maximum.
Conclusion: This long-term study demonstrates that acoustic-electric processing hearing and improvement in speech understanding in quiet and in noise can be accomplished and sustained for many years with a short electrode CI.
Level of evidence: 2C. Laryngoscope, 128:473-481, 2018.
Keywords: Hybrid; cochlear implant; long-term; residual hearing.
© 2017 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no other financial or conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Rizer FM, Arkis PN, Lippy WH, Schuring AG. A postoperative audiometric evaluation of cochlear implant patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1988 Mar;98(3):203–206. - PubMed
-
- van Dijk JE, van Olphen AF, Langereis MC, Mens LH, Brokx JP, Smoorenburg GF. Predictors of cochlear implant performance. Audiology. 1999 Mar-Apr;38(2):109–116. - PubMed
-
- Hodges AV, Schloffman J, Balkany T. Conservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation. The American Journal of Otology. 1997 Mar;18(2):179–183. - PubMed
-
- Skarzynski H, Lorens A, D’Haese P, et al. Preservation of residual hearing in children and post-lingually deafened adults after cochlear implantation: an initial study. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2002 Jul-Aug;64(4):247–253. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
