Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May 17;12(5):e0177874.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177874. eCollection 2017.

Identification of risk factors for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in a high volume center

Affiliations

Identification of risk factors for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in a high volume center

Veit Phillip et al. PLoS One. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background/objectives: Pancreatitis is the most common complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Several patients´ or procedure related risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) have been suggested. The aim of this study was to validate the risk factors for PEP in a high-volume center.

Methods: All patients undergoing first time ERCP at a tertiary referral center between December 2010 and October 2013 were retrospectively included. PEP was defined according to the Atlanta Classification.

Results: 404 patients were included in the final analysis. The risk to develop PEP was increased in patients after inadvertent cannulation of the pancreatic duct (odds ratio 7.468 (2.792–19.975); p<0.001), which occurred in 37.4% of the patients. Inadvertent cannulation occurred significantly more frequently in patients with difficult cannulation of the papilla duodeni major (odds ratio 7.3; p<0.001).

Conclusion: Inadvertent cannulation of the pancreatic duct is a procedure related risk factor for PEP. Measurements on preventing inadvertent cannulation of the pancreatic duct should be established and studies on prophylactic measurements should focus particularly on patients with inadvertent cannulation of the pancreatic duct.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G, Niro G, Valvano MR, Spirito F, et al.. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(8):1781–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01279.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kapral C, Muhlberger A, Wewalka F, Duller C, Knoflach P, Schreiber F, et al.. Quality assessment of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: results of a running nationwide Austrian benchmarking project after 5 years of implementation. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;24(12):1447–54. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e3283583c6f - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kochar B, Akshintala VS, Afghani E, Elmunzer BJ, Kim KJ, Lennon AM, et al.. Incidence, severity, and mortality of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review by using randomized, controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(1):143–9 e9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.06.045 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen YK, Foliente RL, Santoro MJ, Walter MH, Collen MJ. Endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis: increased risk associated with nondilated bile ducts and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;89(3):327–33. - PubMed
    1. Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, Chilovi F, Costan F, De Berardinis F, et al.. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;48(1):1–10. - PubMed