Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jun;8(2):175-180.
doi: 10.1007/s13193-016-0599-9. Epub 2017 Jan 5.

Radical Prostatectomy for Locally Advanced Prostate Cancers-Review of Literature

Affiliations
Review

Radical Prostatectomy for Locally Advanced Prostate Cancers-Review of Literature

N Srivatsa et al. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2017 Jun.

Abstract

Twenty-five to thirty percent of patients with prostate cancer present with locally advanced disease. While risk stratification remains the same with high incidence of upstaging of disease on imaging and histopathological evaluation; there have been progressive refinements in surgical therapy. With availability of reasonably robust data, radical prostatectomy in men with locally advanced prostate cancers seems to effect improvement in both cancer specific and overall survival rates in comparison to the current standard of care of radiation with androgen deprivation therapy. Studies using radical prostatectomy as a part of multimodality approach have also shown promising results. There is an imminent need for well-designed prospective studies of benefits of radical prostatectomy over radiation and androgen deprivation as well as benefits of multimodality therapy over monotherapy. Surgery for patients with locally advanced prostate cancer is technically challenging. Surgical outcomes are comparable to those of organ-confined disease when performed in high-volume centers. Neoadjuvant therapies prior to radical prostatectomy might improve surgical outcomes, but whether they will translate into a better cancer specific and overall survival are yet to be ascertained.

Keywords: High risk localized prostate cancer; Locally advanced prostate cancer; Multimodal therapy in prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yossepowitch O, Eggener SE, Bianco FJ, Jr, Carver BS, Serio A, Scardino PT, et al. Radical prostatectomy for clinically localized, high risk prostate cancer: critical analysis of risk assessment methods. J Urol. 2007;178:493–499. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.105. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Joniau S, Briganti A, Gontero P, Gandaglia G, Tosco L, Fieuws S, et al. Stratification of high-risk prostate cancer into prognostic categories: a European multi-institutional study. Eur Urol. 2014;67:157–164. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.020. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gerber GS, Thisted RA, Chodak GW, Schroder FH, Frohmuller HG, Scardino PT, et al. Results of radical prostatectomy in men with locally advanced prostate cancer: multiinstitution pooled analysis. Eur Urol. 1997;32:385–390. - PubMed
    1. Khan MA, Mangold LA, Epstein JI, Boitnott JK, Walsh PC, Partin AW. Impact of surgical delay on long-term cancer control for clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol. 2004;172(5 Pt 1):1835–1839. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000140277.08623.13. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Joniau S, Hsu CY, Lerut E, Van Baelen A, Haustermans K, Roskams T, et al. A pretreatment table for the prediction of final histopathology after radical prostatectomy in clinical unilateral T3a prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2007;51:388–396. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.06.051. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources