Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 May 10:9:79-92.
doi: 10.2147/RRU.S127209. eCollection 2017.

Biofabrication and biomaterials for urinary tract reconstruction

Affiliations
Review

Biofabrication and biomaterials for urinary tract reconstruction

Moustafa M Elsawy et al. Res Rep Urol. .

Abstract

Reconstructive urologists are constantly facing diverse and complex pathologies that require structural and functional restoration of urinary organs. There is always a demand for a biocompatible material to repair or substitute the urinary tract instead of using patient's autologous tissues with its associated morbidity. Biomimetic approaches are tissue-engineering tactics aiming to tailor the material physical and biological properties to behave physiologically similar to the urinary system. This review highlights the different strategies to mimic urinary tissues including modifications in structure, surface chemistry, and cellular response of a range of biological and synthetic materials. The article also outlines the measures to minimize infectious complications, which might lead to graft failure. Relevant experimental and preclinical studies are discussed, as well as promising biomimetic approaches such as three-dimensional bioprinting.

Keywords: biofunctionalization; reconstruction; tissue engineering; urinary tract.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Approaches for biomaterial fabrication. Note: This figure illustrates the different approaches for fabrication of biomaterials. Abbreviation: 3D, three-dimensional.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Woodhouse CR. Reconstructive urology. Curr Opin Urol. 2009;19(6):555. - PubMed
    1. Sievert KD, Seibold J, Schultheiss D, et al. Rekonstruktive Urologie im Wandel [Reconstructive urology in transition. From its origin into the all too near future] Urologe A. 2006;45(Suppl 4):52–58. German. - PubMed
    1. Damaser MS, Sievert KD. Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: bench to bedside in urology. Preface. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2015;82–83:v–vii. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Albersen M, Cartwright R, Choyke P, et al. Looking forward, looking back – 10 years in urology. Nat Rev Urol. 2014;11(11):649–655. - PubMed
    1. Jordan GH. Principles of tissue transfer techniques in urethral reconstruction. Urol Clin North Am. 2002;29(2):267–275. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources