Pregnant women's preferences for mode of delivery questionnaire: Psychometric properties
- PMID: 28546985
- PMCID: PMC5433639
- DOI: 10.4103/2277-9531.204738
Pregnant women's preferences for mode of delivery questionnaire: Psychometric properties
Abstract
Introduction: The rate of caesarean delivery is increasing worldwide. Maternal beliefs may be influential on the mode of delivery. This study aimed to validate pregnant women's preferences for mode of delivery questionnaire among pregnant women.
Materials and methods: This was a cross-sectional study which was done in Ahvaz Public and Private Health Care Centers. A total of 342 low-risk pregnant women were included in a study conducted in spring 2011 in Ahvaz, Iran. After careful consideration and performing content and face validity, a 62-item measure was developed and subjects completed the questionnaire. Reliability was estimated using internal consistency and validity was assessed by performing face, content and structure and discriminate validity. Data were analyzed using explanatory factor analysis, t-test, and correlations in SPSS 16.
Results: The findings of content and face validity showed almost perfect results for both content validity ratio = 1 and content validity index = 1. The explanatory factor analysis indicated a 7-subscale measure (Eigenvalue >1, factor loading >0.4), and discriminate validity revealed satisfying results P < 0.05 for 6 out of 7 subscales. Internal consistency as measured by the Cronbach's alpha coefficient was acceptable for subscales.
Conclusions: In general, the findings suggest that this newly generated scale is a reliable and valid specific questionnaire for assessing pregnant women's preferences for mode of delivery. However, further studies are needed to establish stronger psychometric properties for the questionnaire.
Keywords: Mode of delivery; pregnancy; psychometric; reliability; validity.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Validity and reliability of Turkish pregnant women's preferences for mode of delivery questionnaire.Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2024 May 27;70(6):e20231539. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20231539. eCollection 2024. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2024. PMID: 38808893 Free PMC article.
-
Introducing a new measure for assessing self-efficacy in response to air pollution hazards for pregnant women.J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2013 Jul 8;11(1):16. doi: 10.1186/2052-336X-11-16. J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2013. PMID: 24491221 Free PMC article.
-
Reliability and validity of the Toileting Behaviors-Women's Elimination Behaviors scale in a Turkish pregnant population.Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Sep;34(9):2125-2132. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05511-7. Epub 2023 Apr 1. Int Urogynecol J. 2023. PMID: 37004519
-
Development and Psychometric Properties of the Decision Making on the Type of Delivery Questionnaire in Iranian Women.Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2017 Jul;5(3):292-302. Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2017. PMID: 28670590 Free PMC article.
-
Development and Validation of the Perception of Labor Pain Questionnaire among Iranian Women.Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2019 Apr;7(2):128-137. doi: 10.30476/IJCBNM.2019.44884. Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2019. PMID: 31041323 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Preferred mode of delivery association with the body image and genital image in pregnant women - a cross-sectional study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Jul 4;23(1):490. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05589-3. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023. PMID: 37403041 Free PMC article.
-
Predicator of Pregnant Women's Self-care Behavior against Air Pollution: An explanation based on the Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM).Electron Physician. 2016 Sep 20;8(9):2871-2877. doi: 10.19082/2871. eCollection 2016 Sep. Electron Physician. 2016. PMID: 27790338 Free PMC article.
-
Childbirth Self-Efficacy and Its Associated Factors among Pregnant Women in Arba Minch Town, Southern Ethiopia, 2023: A Cross-Sectional Study.J Pregnancy. 2024 Feb 15;2024:6478172. doi: 10.1155/2024/6478172. eCollection 2024. J Pregnancy. 2024. PMID: 38390034 Free PMC article.
-
Validity and reliability of Turkish pregnant women's preferences for mode of delivery questionnaire.Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2024 May 27;70(6):e20231539. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20231539. eCollection 2024. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2024. PMID: 38808893 Free PMC article.
-
'No to unnecessary caesarean sections': Evaluation of a mass-media campaign on women's knowledge, attitude and intention for mode of delivery.PLoS One. 2020 Aug 11;15(8):e0235688. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235688. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32780747 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Belizán JM, Althabe F, Cafferata ML. Health consequences of the increasing caesarean section rates. Epidemiology. 2007;18:485–6. - PubMed
-
- Kushtagi P, Guruvare S. Documenting indications for cesarean deliveries. J Postgrad Med. 2008;54:52–3. - PubMed
-
- Rozenberg P. Evaluation of cesarean rate: A necessary progress in modern obstetrics. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2004;33:279–89. - PubMed
-
- Angeja AC, Washington AE, Vargas JE, Gomez R, Rojas I, Caughey AB. Chilean women's preferences regarding mode of delivery: Which do they prefer and why? BJOG. 2006;113:1253–8. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources