Megaherbivores influence trophic guilds structure in African ungulate communities
- PMID: 28547558
- DOI: 10.1007/s00442-002-0919-3
Megaherbivores influence trophic guilds structure in African ungulate communities
Abstract
We used a data set of ungulate censuses from 31 natural ecosystems from East and Southern Africa to test two hypotheses: (1) megaherbivores should dominate ungulate communities in ecosystems with high rainfall and low soil nutrient status because of their ability to survive on poor quality food resources, and (2) the abundance of megaherbivores affects the abundance of the mesoherbivores, distinguishing the different feeding guilds: mesograzers, mesobrowsers and mesomixed feeders. Two axes of a multivariate analysis (77% of the variance) discriminated the sites well, the first separating sites dominated by megaherbivores from those dominated by mesoherbivores, and the second representing a gradient between mesograzers and mesobrowsers. Our analysis shows (1) that megaherbivores can be considered to be a separate trophic guild and (2) that mesograzers and mesobrowsers respond differently to variation in their trophic environments. The metabolic biomass density of megaherbivores increased with annual rainfall, but was not related to soil nutrient status, and as predicted, megaherbivores comprised a larger proportion of the biomass of ungulate communities in ecosystems with high rainfall and low nutrient soils. The metabolic biomass density of mesoherbivores increased with rainfall and soil nutrient status. Within the mesoherbivores, the metabolic biomass density of mesograzers showed the same trend, and seemed unaffected by megaherbivores. Conversely, mesobrowsers and mesomixed feeders appeared to be unaffected by rainfall or soil nutrient status, but mesomixed feeders declined when megaherbivores were abundant. This suggests that megaherbivores may compete with the mesomixed-feeder species for food or they may alter the vegetation communities unfavourably. A similar analysis using elephants alone instead of megaherbivores as a group showed that both mesobrowsers and mesomixed feeders were affected significantly by elephant, which is consistent with the fact that most of the effect of megaherbivores on browse resources or woodland habitat is due to elephants. This study shows that the different trophic guilds within African ungulate communities react differently to environmental factors (rain and soil), and that megaherbivores, and particularly elephants, appear to compete with mesomixed feeders and mesobrowsers. These results are relevant for the understanding of the functioning of African ungulate communities and call for further testing with longitudinal data.
Keywords: Browsers; Grazers; Herbivory; Mesoherbivores; Savannas.
Similar articles
-
Influence of cattle on browsing and grazing wildlife varies with rainfall and presence of megaherbivores.Ecol Appl. 2017 Apr;27(3):786-798. doi: 10.1002/eap.1482. Epub 2017 Mar 13. Ecol Appl. 2017. PMID: 27935669
-
Mesoherbivores affect grasshopper communities in a megaherbivore-dominated South African savannah.Oecologia. 2014 Jun;175(2):639-49. doi: 10.1007/s00442-014-2920-z. Epub 2014 Apr 5. Oecologia. 2014. PMID: 24705648
-
Elephants in the understory: opposing direct and indirect effects of consumption and ecosystem engineering by megaherbivores.Ecology. 2016 Nov;97(11):3219-3230. doi: 10.1002/ecy.1557. Ecology. 2016. PMID: 27870025
-
Are hippos Africa's most influential megaherbivore? A review of ecosystem engineering by the semi-aquatic common hippopotamus.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2023 Oct;98(5):1509-1529. doi: 10.1111/brv.12960. Epub 2023 Apr 24. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2023. PMID: 37095627 Review.
-
Conservation lessons from large-mammal manipulations in East African savannas: the KLEE, UHURU, and GLADE experiments.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018 Oct;1429(1):31-49. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13848. Epub 2018 May 11. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018. PMID: 29752729 Review.
Cited by
-
Sheep grazing and rodent populations: evidence of negative interactions from a landscape scale experiment.Oecologia. 2005 Apr;143(3):357-64. doi: 10.1007/s00442-004-1792-z. Epub 2005 Feb 23. Oecologia. 2005. PMID: 15726430
-
The anomalous Kentucky coffeetree: megafaunal fruit sinking to extinction?Oecologia. 2009 Aug;161(2):221-6. doi: 10.1007/s00442-009-1372-3. Epub 2009 Jun 2. Oecologia. 2009. PMID: 19488788 Review.
-
Mass harvested per trunkload as a constraint to forage consumption by the African savanna elephant (Loxodonta africana).PeerJ. 2025 Mar 5;13:e19033. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19033. eCollection 2025. PeerJ. 2025. PMID: 40061236 Free PMC article.
-
Range Analysis and Terrain Preference of Adult Southern White Rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum) in a South African Private Game Reserve: Insights into Carrying Capacity and Future Management.PLoS One. 2016 Sep 13;11(9):e0161724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161724. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27622566 Free PMC article.
-
Flight initiation distance and bird tolerance to humans in rural and urban habitats.R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Oct 9;11(10):240332. doi: 10.1098/rsos.240332. eCollection 2024 Oct. R Soc Open Sci. 2024. PMID: 39386984 Free PMC article.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous