Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug;101(15):6229-6240.
doi: 10.1007/s00253-017-8340-3. Epub 2017 May 25.

Effects of electron acceptors on sulphate reduction activity in activated sludge processes

Affiliations

Effects of electron acceptors on sulphate reduction activity in activated sludge processes

Francisco Rubio-Rincón et al. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017 Aug.

Abstract

The concentration of sulphate present in wastewater can vary from 10 to 500 mg SO42-/L. During anaerobic conditions, sulphate is reduced to sulphide by sulphate-reducing bacteria (SRB). Sulphide generation is undesired in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). Previous research indicated that SRB are inhibited by the presence of electron acceptors (such as O2, NO3 and NO2). However, the contact times and concentrations used in those studies are by far higher than occur in WWTPs. Since sulphide can influence the biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal processes, this research aimed to understand how the different electron acceptors commonly present in biological nutrient removal (BNR) systems can affect the proliferation of SRB. For this purpose, a culture of SRB was enriched in a sequencing batch reactor (approx. 88% of the total bacteria population). Once enriched, the SRB were exposed for 2 h to typical concentrations of electron acceptors like those observed in BNR systems. Their activity was assessed using three different types of electron donors (acetate, propionate and lactate). Oxygen was the most inhibiting electron acceptor regardless the carbon source used. After exposure to oxygen and when feeding acetate, an inactivation time in the sulphate reduction activity was observed for 1.75 h. Once the sulphate reduction activity resumed, only 60% of the original activity was recovered. It is suggested that the proliferation of SRB is most likely to occur in BNR plants with an anaerobic fraction higher than 15% and operating at sludge retention times higher than 20 days (at a temperature of 20 °C). These results can be used to implement strategies to control the growth of sulphate reducers that might compete for organic carbon with phosphate-accumulating organisms.

Keywords: Biological nutrients removal; Electron acceptor inhibition; Sulphate reduction activity; Sulphate-reducing bacteria; Wastewater treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethical statement

This study was partially funded by CONACYT [214775].

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Sulphide (circles), sulphate (diamonds), acetate (triangles), propionate (plus signs), lactate (multiplication signs) and soluble COD (dashes) profiles of the SRB enrichment culture observed during a typical cycle in the parent reactor
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
FISH microbial characterization of the biomass present in the parent reactor: a DAPI (all living organism), b EUB MIX (all bacteria), c SRB385 (most sulphate reducers) and d DBB660 (Desulfobulbus). e Overlap of ad
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
DGGE band pattern and phylogenetic tree of the biomass enriched in the parent reactor
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Profiles observed in the control tests showing the concentrations of sulphide (circles), sulphate (diamonds), acetate (triangles), propionate (plus signs), lactate (multiplication signs), soluble organic COD (dashes) profiles in the control test performed with a lactate, b propionate or c acetate as carbon source
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Likelihood of lactate sulphate reducers growing in a BNR plant at different anaerobic contact times (1 to 2 h), anaerobic fractions (5 to 20%) and 8 days (blue), 15 days (orange), 20 days (grey) or 25 days (yellow) SRT at 20 C. Considering that the sludge is flocculent, i.e., there is no limitation of substrate and considering a minimum lag phase of 0.4 h for the SRB as observed in this study (Colour figure online)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abdeen S, Di W, Hui L, Chen G-H, van Loosdrecht MCM. Fecal coliform removal in a sulfate reduction, autotrophic denitrification and nitrification integrated (SANI) process for saline sewage treatment. WST. 2010;62(11):2564–2570. doi: 10.2166/wst.2010.516. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amman RI. In situ identification of micro-organisms by whole cell hybridization with rRNA-targeted nucleic acid probes. In: Ackkermans A, van Elsas J, de Bruijn F, editors. MMEMl. Dordrecht: Klower Academy Publications; 1995.
    1. APHA, AWWA, WEF (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 22th ed. AWWA
    1. Barton LL, Hamilton WA (2007) Sulphate-reducing bacteria: environmental and engineered systems, Cambridge
    1. Bassin JP, Pronk M, Muyzer G, Kleerebezem R, Dezotti M, van Loosdrecht MCM. Effect of elevated salt concentrations on the aerobic granular sludge process: linking microbial activity with microbial community structure. AEM. 2011;77(22):7942–7953. doi: 10.1128/AEM.05016-11. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources