Variation in Cesarean Birth Rates by Labor and Delivery Nurses
- PMID: 28549612
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jogn.2017.03.009
Variation in Cesarean Birth Rates by Labor and Delivery Nurses
Abstract
Objective: To examine variation in the cesarean birth rates of women cared for by labor and delivery nurses.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: One high-volume labor and delivery unit at an academic medical center in a major metropolitan area.
Participants: Labor and delivery nurses who cared for nulliparous women who gave birth to term, singleton fetuses in vertex presentation.
Methods: Data were extracted from electronic hospital birth records from January 1, 2013 through June 30, 2015. Cesarean rates for individual nurses were calculated based on the number of women they attended who gave birth by cesarean. Nurses were grouped into quartiles by their cesarean rates, and the effect of these rates on the likelihood of cesarean birth was estimated by a logit regression model adjusting for patient-level characteristics and clustering of births within nurses.
Results: Seventy-two nurses attended 3,031 births. The mean nurse cesarean rate was 26% (95% confidence interval [23.9, 28.1]) and ranged from 8.3% to 48%. The adjusted odds of cesarean for births attended by nurses in the highest quartile was nearly 3 times (odds ratio = 2.73, 95% confidence interval [2.3, 3.3]) greater than for births attended by nurses in the lowest quartile.
Conclusion: The labor and delivery nurse assigned to a woman may influence the likelihood of cesarean birth. Nurse-level cesarean birth data could be used to design practice improvement initiatives to improve nurse performance. More precise measurement of the relative influence of nurses on mode of birth is needed.
Keywords: cesarean; measurement; nursing; quality indicators; variation.
Copyright © 2017 AWHONN, the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
On "Variation in Cesarean Birth Rates by Labor and Delivery Nurses".J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2018 Mar;47(2):233-234. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2017.12.004. Epub 2018 Feb 8. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2018. PMID: 29427564 No abstract available.
-
In Response.J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2018 Mar;47(2):234-235. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Feb 9. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2018. PMID: 29428519 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical