24-2 Visual Fields Miss Central Defects Shown on 10-2 Tests in Glaucoma Suspects, Ocular Hypertensives, and Early Glaucoma
- PMID: 28551166
- PMCID: PMC5610609
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.04.021
24-2 Visual Fields Miss Central Defects Shown on 10-2 Tests in Glaucoma Suspects, Ocular Hypertensives, and Early Glaucoma
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the prevalence of visual field defects in glaucomatous eyes, glaucoma suspects, and ocular hypertensives with 24-2 and 10-2 visual fields.
Design: Prospective, cross-sectional study.
Participants: Patients with or suspected glaucoma tested with 24-2 and 10-2. Patients were classified into 3 groups on the basis of the presence of glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON) and 24-2 visual field abnormalities: early glaucoma (GON and abnormal visual field, mean deviation >-6 decibels [dB]), glaucoma suspects (GON and normal visual field), and ocular hypertensives (normal disc, normal visual field, and intraocular pressure >22 mmHg). For the classification of visual field abnormalities, 24-2 and 10-2 tests performed on the same visit were analyzed.
Main outcome measures: Comparison of the prevalence of abnormal 24-2 versus 10-2 visual field results based on cluster criteria in each diagnostic group.
Results: A total of 775 eyes (497 patients) were evaluated. A total of 364 eyes had early glaucoma, 303 eyes were glaucoma suspects, and 108 eyes were ocular hypertensives. In the glaucoma group, 16 of the 26 eyes (61.5%) classified as normal based on cluster criteria on 24-2 tests were classified as abnormal on 10-2 visual fields. In eyes with suspected glaucoma, 79 of the 200 eyes (39.5%) classified as normal on the 24-2 test were classified as abnormal on 10-2 visual fields. In ocular hypertensive eyes, 28 of the 79 eyes (35.4%) classified as normal on the 24-2 were classified as abnormal on the 10-2. Patients of African descent were more likely to have an abnormal 10-2 result (67.3 vs. 56.8%, P = 0.009).
Conclusions: Central visual field damage seen on the 10-2 test is often missed with the 24-2 strategy in all groups. This finding has implications for the diagnosis of glaucoma and classification of severity.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00221923.
Copyright © 2017 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures

Comment in
-
Reply.Ophthalmology. 2018 Apr;125(4):e27-e28. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.11.035. Ophthalmology. 2018. PMID: 29566874 No abstract available.
-
Re: De Moraes et al.: 24-2 Visual fields miss central defects shown on 10-2 tests in glaucoma suspects, ocular hypertensives, and early glaucoma (Ophthalmology. 2017;124:1449-1456).Ophthalmology. 2018 Apr;125(4):e27. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.11.034. Ophthalmology. 2018. PMID: 29566875 No abstract available.
References
-
- Drance SM. The early field defects in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol. 1969;8:84–91. - PubMed
-
- Langerhorst CT, Carenini LL, Bakker D, De Bie-Raakman MAC. Measurements for description of very early glaucomatous field defects. In: Wall M, Heiji A, editors. Perimetry Update 1996/1997. New York, NY: Kugler Publications; 1997.
-
- Park HY, Hwang BE, Shin HY, Park CK. Clinical Clues to Predict the Presence of Parafoveal Scotoma on Humphrey 10-2 Visual Field Using a Humphrey 24-2 Visual Field. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;161:150–159. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous