Clinical Implications of Different Blood Pressure Measurement Techniques
- PMID: 28551831
- DOI: 10.1007/s11906-017-0751-0
Clinical Implications of Different Blood Pressure Measurement Techniques
Abstract
Purpose of review: The appropriate treatment targets for individuals with elevated blood pressure (BP) have received increased attention in light of recent clinical trial results. However, it is well known that the method used to measure BP can have a significant impact on the observed BP. In this review, we summarize the existing literature on the impact of BP measurement technique on observed BP readings.
Recent findings: Manual BPs obtained in-clinic routinely differ from those obtained using automated devices. Further, clinic-based readings (either manual or automated) typically correlate poorly with readings from ambulatory BP monitoring or home-based devices. However, few studies utilize randomization or sound experimental design to explore differences in BP readings by method or technique. While numerous studies report differences in BP by method, most lack statistical rigor and therefore provide limited insight into the true effect of technique on BP measurements.
Keywords: Ambulatory blood pressure; Automated office blood pressure; Guidelines; Measurement technique.
Similar articles
-
Replacing manual sphygmomanometers with automated blood pressure measurement in routine clinical practice.Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2014 Jan;41(1):46-53. doi: 10.1111/1440-1681.12149. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2014. PMID: 23819734 Review.
-
The Gap Between Manual and Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurements Results at a Hypertension Clinic.Can J Cardiol. 2017 May;33(5):653-657. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.01.021. Epub 2017 Feb 2. Can J Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 28449835
-
Automated office versus home measurement of blood pressure in the assessment of morning hypertension.Blood Press Monit. 2012 Feb;17(1):24-34. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e3283503760. Blood Press Monit. 2012. PMID: 22218221
-
Unfounded concerns about the use of automated office blood pressure measurement in SPRINT.J Am Soc Hypertens. 2016 Dec;10(12):903-905. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Oct 21. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2016. PMID: 27863819
-
Cuffless Blood Pressure Devices.Am J Hypertens. 2022 May 10;35(5):380-387. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpac017. Am J Hypertens. 2022. PMID: 35136906 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
BP Measurement in Clinical Practice: Time to SPRINT to Guideline-Recommended Protocols.J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018 Feb;29(2):383-388. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2017070753. Epub 2017 Oct 19. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018. PMID: 29051347 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Quality in screening and measuring blood pressure in China's primary health care: a national cross-sectional study using unannounced standardized patients.Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023 Nov 23;43:100973. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100973. eCollection 2024 Feb. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023. PMID: 38076324 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical implications of central blood pressure measured by radial tonometry and automated office blood pressure measured using automatic devices in cardiovascular diseases.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Aug 11;9:906021. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.906021. eCollection 2022. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022. PMID: 36035931 Free PMC article.
-
Masked Hypertension.Curr Hypertens Rep. 2017 Sep 19;19(10):81. doi: 10.1007/s11906-017-0779-1. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2017. PMID: 28929438 Review. No abstract available.
-
Low Concordance Between Blood Pressures Measured in Periodic Health Examinations and in a Workplace-Based Hypertension Management Program.Phenomics. 2022 Aug 18;2(6):419-429. doi: 10.1007/s43657-022-00067-w. eCollection 2022 Dec. Phenomics. 2022. PMID: 36939804 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials