Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jul;19(7):54.
doi: 10.1007/s11906-017-0751-0.

Clinical Implications of Different Blood Pressure Measurement Techniques

Affiliations
Review

Clinical Implications of Different Blood Pressure Measurement Techniques

Paul Drawz. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2017 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose of review: The appropriate treatment targets for individuals with elevated blood pressure (BP) have received increased attention in light of recent clinical trial results. However, it is well known that the method used to measure BP can have a significant impact on the observed BP. In this review, we summarize the existing literature on the impact of BP measurement technique on observed BP readings.

Recent findings: Manual BPs obtained in-clinic routinely differ from those obtained using automated devices. Further, clinic-based readings (either manual or automated) typically correlate poorly with readings from ambulatory BP monitoring or home-based devices. However, few studies utilize randomization or sound experimental design to explore differences in BP readings by method or technique. While numerous studies report differences in BP by method, most lack statistical rigor and therefore provide limited insight into the true effect of technique on BP measurements.

Keywords: Ambulatory blood pressure; Automated office blood pressure; Guidelines; Measurement technique.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Hum Hypertens. 2003 Dec;17(12):811-7 - PubMed
    1. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2016 Jun;10 (6):493-9 - PubMed
    1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jan 3;59(1):74-83 - PubMed
    1. Blood Press Monit. 2006 Apr;11(2):59-62 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 2001 Apr 14;322(7291):908-11 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources