Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Aug 15:329:96-111.
doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2017.05.025. Epub 2017 May 26.

Nanotechnology in agriculture: Opportunities, toxicological implications, and occupational risks

Affiliations
Review

Nanotechnology in agriculture: Opportunities, toxicological implications, and occupational risks

Ivo Iavicoli et al. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. .

Abstract

Nanotechnology has the potential to make a beneficial impact on several agricultural, forestry, and environmental challenges, such as urbanization, energy constraints, and sustainable use of resources. However, new environmental and human health hazards may emerge from nano-enhanced applications. This raises concerns for agricultural workers who may become primarily exposed to such xenobiotics during their job tasks. The aim of this review is to discuss promising solutions that nanotechnology may provide in agricultural activities, with a specific focus on critical aspects, challenging issues, and research needs for occupational risk assessment and management in this emerging field. Eco-toxicological aspects were not the focus of the review. Nano-fertilizers, (nano-sized nutrients, nano-coated fertilizers, or engineered metal-oxide or carbon-based nanomaterials per se), and nano-pesticides, (nano-formulations of traditional active ingredients or inorganic nanomaterials), may provide a targeted/controlled release of agrochemicals, aimed to obtain their fullest biological efficacy without over-dosage. Nano-sensors and nano-remediation methods may detect and remove environmental contaminants. However, limited knowledge concerning nanomaterial biosafety, adverse effects, fate, and acquired biological reactivity once dispersed into the environment, requires further scientific efforts to assess possible nano-agricultural risks. In this perspective, toxicological research should be aimed to define nanomaterial hazards and levels of exposure along the life-cycle of nano-enabled products, and to assess those physico-chemical features affecting nanomaterial toxicity, possible interactions with agro-system co-formulants, and stressors. Overall, this review highlights the importance to define adequate risk management strategies for workers, occupational safety practices and policies, as well as to develop a responsible regulatory consensus on nanotechnology in agriculture.

Keywords: Nano-enabled agrochemicals; Nano-enhanced environmental remediation; Nanocellulose; Nanotechnology; Nanotoxicology; Occupational risk assessment and management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Nano-enabled products and related uses in agriculture.A: Nano-pesticide formulations (silver, copper, aluminum, mesoporous silica and titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2-NPs); B: Nano-fertilizers (macro- and micro-nutrients at nanoscale level or encapsulated by nanomaterials (NMs) such as multi walled carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and TiO2-NPs; C: Nanosensors (noble metal NPs, metal oxide NPs and metal-nanocluster including gold, silver, platinum and copper, quantum dots, graphene and CNTs); D: Nanoproducts for water and/or soil remediation (silica, silver, copper, aluminum, zero valent iron, palladium, nano-structured bimetallic systems, cellulose based and carbonaceous NMs).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Main elements, actions and recommendations of the nano – agricultural risk assessment and management programs.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Life-cycle of nano-enabled products used in agriculture.

References

    1. Adeleye AS, Conway JR, Garner K, Huang Y, Su Y, Keller AA, 2016. Engineered nanomaterials for water treatment and remediation: costs, benefits, and applicability. Chem. Eng. J 286:640–662. 10.1016/j.cej.2015.10.105. - DOI
    1. Anjali CH, Sudheer Khan S, Margulis-Goshen K, Magdassi S, Mukherjee A, Chandrasekaran N, 2010. Formulation of water-dispersible nanopermethrin for larvicidal applications. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf 73:1932–1936. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2010.08.039. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anton N, Benoit JP, Saulnier P, 2008. Design and production of nanoparticles formulated from nano-emulsion templates-a review. J. Control. Release 128:185–199. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.02.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ao M, Zhu Y, He S, Li D, Li P, Li J, Cao Y, 2013. Preparation and characterization of 1-naphthylacetic acid-silica conjugated nanospheres for enhancement of controlled-release performance. Nanotechnology 24:035601 10.1088/0957-4484/24/3/035601. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baac H, Hajós JP, Lee J, Kim D, Kim SJ, Shuler ML, 2006. Antibody-based surface plasmon resonance detection of intact viral pathogen. Biotechnol. Bioeng 94:815–819. 10.1002/bit.20882. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms