Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Sep;1864(9):1494-1506.
doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2017.05.018. Epub 2017 May 26.

ER-plasma membrane junctions: Why and how do we study them?

Affiliations
Review

ER-plasma membrane junctions: Why and how do we study them?

Chi-Lun Chang et al. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2017 Sep.

Abstract

Endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-plasma membrane (PM) junctions are membrane microdomains important for communication between the ER and the PM. ER-PM junctions were first reported in muscle cells in 1957, but mostly ignored in non-excitable cells due to their scarcity and lack of functional significance. In 2005, the discovery of stromal interaction molecule 1 (STIM1) mediating a universal Ca2+ feedback mechanism at ER-PM junctions in mammalian cells led to a resurgence of research interests toward ER-PM junctions. In the past decade, several major advancements have been made in this emerging topic in cell biology, including the generation of tools for labeling ER-PM junctions and the unraveling of mechanisms underlying regulation and functions of ER-PM junctions. This review summarizes early studies, recently developed tools, and current advances in the characterization and understanding of ER-PM junctions. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Membrane Contact Sites edited by Christian Ungermann and Benoit Kornmann.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Activation of SOCE at ER-PM junctions by STIM1
(A) A diagram of the domain structure of human STIM1. EF-SAM, EF hand and sterile alpha motif; TM, transmembrane; CC, coiled-coil domain; S/P, serine and proline rich region; PB, polybasic motif. (B) Bottom-section confocal images of a HeLa cell co-expressing YFP-STIM1 and a CFP-tagged ER luminal marker. The cell was imaged at the resting state (left), after 5 µM 2',5'-di (tert-butyl)-1,4-benzohydroquinone (BHQ) treatment to deplete ER Ca2+ store (middle), and 3 min after BHQ washout to allow ER Ca2+ store refill (right). (C) Schematic representation of SOCE activation. In the resting state, STIM1 binds to Ca2+ and localizes diffusely throughout the ER. Following ER Ca2+ depletion, dissociation of Ca2+ from STIM1 triggers STIM1 conformational change and oligomerization. STIM1 oligomers translocate to ER-PM junctions by binding to PM PIP2 via its PB domain. STIM1 at ER-PM junctions subsequently recruits Orai1 and activates SOCE to sustain elevated cytosolic Ca2+ levels and refill ER Ca2+ store.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Visualization of ER-PM junctions using ER-labeling or MAPPER
(A) TIRF images (top) of a HeLa cell co-expressing an YFP-tagged ER luminal marker and mCherry-STIM1. The cell was imaged at time zero (left), 5 min after 5 µM BHQ treatment to induce STIM1 translocation (middle), and 5 min after BHQ washout (right). Arrows indicate stable ER puncta corresponding to ER-PM junctions. Schematic diagrams (bottom) depicting STIM1 translocation to ER-PM junctions. The scale bar represents 2 µm. (B) Domain structure of MAPPER. GFP, green fluorescence protein; TM, transmembrane; FRB, FKBP12-rapamycin binding; PB, polybasic motif from the small G protein Rit. (C) Bottom-section confocal images of a HeLa cell co-expressing MAPPER and a mCherry-tagged ER luminal marker. The scale bar represents 2 µm. © Chang et al. and Cell Reports, 2013. Originally published in Cell Reports, 5 (2013) 813–825. (D) TIRF image of a HeLa cell co-expressing MAPPER and a mCherry-tagged ER luminal marker. The scale bar represents 2 µm. © Chang et al. and Cell Reports, 2013. Originally published in Cell Reports, 5 (2013) 813–825. (E) STIM1 translocation induced by 1µM thapsigargin (TG) monitored by TIRF microscopy in a HeLa cell co-expressing MAPPER and mCherry-STIM1. The scale bar represents 2 µm. © Chang et al. and Cell Reports, 2013. Originally published in Cell Reports, 5 (2013) 813–825. (F) Density of ER-PM junctions labeled by ER marker or MAPPER in HeLa cells monitored by TIRF microscopy. Mean ± SD is shown. © Chang et al. and Cell Reports, 2013. Originally published in Cell Reports, 5 (2013) 813–825.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Proteins that localize at yeast cortical ER
Domain structure of yeast proteins localized at the cortical ER. Black bar, transmembrane; PB, polybasic motif; HS, hydrophobic segments; SMP, synaptotagmin-like mitochondrial lipid binding protein domain; MSP, major sperm protein domain; PH, pleckstrin homology; FFAT, two phenylalanines in an acidic tract motif; ORD, OSBP-related domain; BAR, Bin/Amphiphysin/Rvs domain; PHg, GRAM domains in the Pleckstrin homology domain; StART, Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory Transfer domain; cER, the cortical ER.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Proteins that localize at ER-PM junctions in non-excitable mammalian cells
Domain structure of proteins that localize at ER-PM junctions in mammalian cells. HS, hydrophobic segments; SMP, synaptotagmin-like mitochondrial lipid binding protein domain; EF-SAM, EF hand and sterile alpha motif; Black bar, transmembrane; CC, coiled-coil domain; S/P, serine and proline rich region; PB, polybasic motif; MSP, major sperm protein domain; PITP, PI transfer protein domain; FFAT, two phenylalanines in an acidic tract motif; LNS2, Lipin/Ned1/Smp2 domain. ER-PM, ER-PM junction; ER-Mito, ER-Mitochondria contacts.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Model depicting dynamic localization of proteins at ER-PM junctions during receptor activation
E-Syt2 and E-Syt3 readily localize at ER-PM junctions by binding to PM PIP2 in the resting state. During mild receptor activation, STIM2 responds to a small decrease in ER Ca2+ level to activate Orai1 at ERPM junctions for SOCE. E-Syt1 responds to an increase cytosolic Ca2+ level to mediate a decrease in gap distance at ER-PM junctions. Nir3 responds to a small increase in PA at the PM resulting from PIP2 hydrolysis to mediate PI/PA exchange at ER-PM junctions for PM PIP2 homeostasis. Following further or intense receptor activation, STIM1 and Nir2 translocate to ER-PM junctions to support the homeostatic regulation of the PIP2-Ca2+ signaling system with STIM2, Nir3, and E-Syt1.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Baumann O, Walz B. Endoplasmic reticulum of animal cells and its organization into structural and functional domains. International review of cytology. 2001;205:149–214. - PubMed
    1. West M, Zurek N, Hoenger A, Voeltz GK. A 3D analysis of yeast ER structure reveals how ER domains are organized by membrane curvature. The Journal of cell biology. 2011;193:333–346. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nixon-Abell J, Obara CJ, Weigel AV, Li D, Legant WR, Xu CS, Pasolli HA, Harvey K, Hess HF, Betzig E, Blackstone C, Lippincott-Schwartz J. Increased spatiotemporal resolution reveals highly dynamic dense tubular matrices in the peripheral ER. Science. 2016;354 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berridge MJ, Lipp P, Bootman MD. The versatility and universality of calcium signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2000;1:11–21. - PubMed
    1. Carrasco S, Meyer T. STIM proteins and the endoplasmic reticulum-plasma membrane junctions. Annu Rev Biochem. 2011;80:973–1000. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources