Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep;127(3):466-474.
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001708.

Accuracy of Capillary and Arterial Whole Blood Glucose Measurements Using a Glucose Meter in Patients under General Anesthesia in the Operating Room

Affiliations

Accuracy of Capillary and Arterial Whole Blood Glucose Measurements Using a Glucose Meter in Patients under General Anesthesia in the Operating Room

Brad S Karon et al. Anesthesiology. 2017 Sep.

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of a glucose meter with surgical patients under general anesthesia in the operating room.

Methods: Glucose measurements were performed intraoperatively on 368 paired capillary and arterial whole blood samples using a Nova StatStrip (Nova Biomedical, USA) glucose meter and compared with 368 reference arterial whole blood glucose measurements by blood gas analyzer in 196 patients. Primary outcomes were median bias (meter minus reference), percentage of glucose meter samples meeting accuracy criteria for subcutaneous insulin dosing as defined by Parkes error grid analysis for type 1 diabetes mellitus, and accuracy criteria for intravenous insulin infusion as defined by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Time under anesthesia, patient position, diabetes status, and other variables were studied to determine whether any affected glucose meter bias.

Results: Median bias (interquartile range) was -4 mg/dl (-9 to 0 mg/dl), which did not differ from median arterial meter bias of -5 mg/dl (-9 to -1 mg/dl; P = 0.32). All of the capillary and arterial glucose meter values met acceptability criteria for subcutaneous insulin dosing, whereas only 89% (327 of 368) of capillary and 93% (344 of 368) arterial glucose meter values met accuracy criteria for intravenous insulin infusion. Time, patient position, and diabetes status were not associated with meter bias.

Conclusions: Capillary and arterial blood glucose measured using the glucose meter are acceptable for intraoperative subcutaneous insulin dosing. Whole blood glucose on the meter did not meet accuracy guidelines established specifically for more intensive (e.g., intravenous insulin) glycemic control in the acute care environment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: Brad S. Karon has received travel support from Nova Biomedical Corporation.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Clinical concordance between capillary glucose meter (1a) and arterial glucose meter (1b) and reference glucose values as demonstrated by the Parkes error grid for Type 1 Diabetes. To meet ISO 15197:2013 accuracy guidelines, 99% of glucose meter values must fall within zone A (no effect on clinical action) or zone B (altered clinical action—little or no effect on clinical outcome). Zones C-E on the error grid represent progressively more serious insulin dosing errors that may lead to patient harm.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Bland Altman plot of capillary and arterial glucose meter bias (glucose meter minus reference glucose) vs. mean of glucose meter and reference glucose value. Dashed lines represent CLSI POCT12-A3 error tolerances of ± 12.5 mg/dL (reference glucose < 100 mg/dl) and ±12.5% (reference glucose ≥100 mg/dL).

Comment in

  • Assessing Glucose Meter Accuracy: The Details Matter!
    Liang Y, Rice MJ. Liang Y, et al. Anesthesiology. 2018 May;128(5):1044-1045. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002149. Anesthesiology. 2018. PMID: 29664784 No abstract available.
  • In Reply.
    Karon BS, Donato LJ, Larsen Mogensen CM, Siebenaler LK, Wells AE, Wood-Wentz CM, Marienau ME, Curry TB. Karon BS, et al. Anesthesiology. 2018 May;128(5):1045-1046. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002150. Anesthesiology. 2018. PMID: 29664785 No abstract available.

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [Accessed December 17, 2015];2014 National Diabetes Statistics Report. http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/statistics/2014statisticsreport.html.
    1. NICE-SUGAR Study Investigators. Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1283–1297. - PubMed
    1. Lewis K, Kane-Gill S, Bobek M, Dasta J. Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients. Ann Pharmacother. 2004;38:1243–51. - PubMed
    1. Van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, Verwaest C, Bruyninckx F, Schietz M, Vlasselaers D, Ferdinande P, Lauwers P, Bouillon R. Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1359–67. - PubMed
    1. Kwon S, Thompson R, Dellinger P, Yanez D, Farrohki E, Flum D. Importance of perioperative glycemic control in general surgery: a report from the Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program. Ann Surg. 2013;257:8–14. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types