Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun 20;56(24):3089-3098.
doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00285. Epub 2017 Jun 9.

Global Kinetic Mechanism of Microsomal Glutathione Transferase 1 and Insights into Dynamic Enzyme Activation

Affiliations

Global Kinetic Mechanism of Microsomal Glutathione Transferase 1 and Insights into Dynamic Enzyme Activation

Linda Spahiu et al. Biochemistry. .

Abstract

Microsomal glutathione transferase 1 (MGST1) has a unique ability to be activated, ≤30-fold, by modification with sulfhydryl reagents. MGST1 exhibits one-third-of-the-sites reactivity toward glutathione and hence heterogeneous binding to different active sites in the homotrimer. Limited turnover stopped-flow kinetic measurements of the activated enzyme allowed us to more accurately determine the KD for the "third" low-affinity GSH binding site (1.4 ± 0.3 mM). The rate of thiolate formation, k2 (0.77 ± 0.06 s-1), relevant to turnover, could also be determined. By deriving the steady-state rate equation for a random sequential mechanism for MGST1, we can predict KM, kcat, and kcat/KM values from these and previously determined pre-steady-state rate constants (all determined at 5 °C). To assess whether the pre-steady-state behavior can account for the steady-state kinetic behavior, we have determined experimental values for kinetic parameters at 5 °C. For reactive substrates and the activated enzyme, data for the microscopic steps account for the global mechanism of MGST1. For the unactivated enzyme and more reactive electrophilic substrates, pre-steady-state and steady-state data can be reconciled only if a more active subpopulation of MGST1 is assumed. We suggest that unactivated MGST1 can be partially activated in its unmodified form. The existence of an activated subpopulation (approximately 10%) could be demonstrated in limited turnover experiments. We therefore suggest that MSGT1 displays a preexisting dynamic equilibrium between high- and low-activity forms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Richard N. Armstrong sadly passed in 2015. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Structures of the electrophilic substrates used in this study and their specific reactivity described by Hammett substituent constants for the para position (σ): 2,5-dichloronitrobenzene (2,5-DCNB, σ = 0.23), 4-chloro-3-nitro-benzamide (CNBAM, σ = 0.63), 4-chloro-3-nitroacetophenone (CNAP, σ = 0.87), 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB, σ = 1.3).
Figure 2
Figure 2
GSH-binding and thiolate formation to activated MGST1 after limited turnover. Limited turnover experiment where GSH-bound MGST1 is rapidly mixed with CDNB at a ratio of approximately 1.5/trimer. Thiolate anion re-formation was recorded after the initial burst (mixing the enzyme with 8 µM CDNB) as an increase in absorbance at 239 nm with 0.25–20 mM GSH. The dependence of kobs for GSH thiolate formation on GSH concentration was fitted to Equation 1 in GraphPad Prism 5. Measurement values are given ± standard error of the mean. Enzyme concentration used was 5.8 µM trimer as measured by an active site titration (not shown).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Ratios of the calculated vs experimental catalytic constants for (●) KM, (□) kcat and (▲) kcat/KM. (A) Activated MGST1, saturating GSH and varying electrophile concentrations. (B) Unactivated MGST1, saturating GSH and varying electrophile concentrations. (C) Activated MGST1, saturating electrophile and varying GSH concentrations. (D) Unactivated MGST1, saturating electrophile and varying GSH concentrations.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Representative image of the limited turnover process. The second order rate constant k4 will be used below for fitting the chemical reaction between EGS and CDNB and was derived as the initial slope of the fit of CDNB bursts in references, circumventing any uncertainty in the binding affinity of CDNB.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(A) Unactivated MGST1 limited turnover. Simulation based on assumption that the entire enzyme population is in its unactivated form. k2 is set to that optimized by the KinTec Explorer program in Figure 5B. (B) Unactivated MGST1 limited turnover. Simulation based on assumption that a fraction of the enzyme population is in an activated form (10 %). k2 for the unactivated and activated enzyme populations are fit by KinTek Explorer to 0.0055 s−1 and 0.77 s−1 respectively.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Activated MGST1 limited turnover. Simulation based on assumption that the entire enzyme population is in its activated form. k2 for the activated enzyme is fit by KinTek Explorer to 0.41 s−1.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Hammett plots of steady-state kinetic parameters for four electrophilic substrates 2,5-DCNB, CNBAM, CNAP, CDNB (left to right), and GSH at 5°C. (●) NEM activated MGST1 log kcat/KM, (○) Unactivated MGST1 log kcat/KM, (■) NEM activated MGST1, log kcat and (□) Unactivated MGST1 log kcat. All experiments were performed at 5 °C. (A) Saturating GSH concentration (5 mM) and varying concentration of the electrophile. (B) Saturating concentrations of electrophile (1 mM for all except CDNB which was at 0.5 mM) and varying GSH concentration. Slopes are indicated.
Figure 8
Figure 8
MGST1 representation with subunits in different color showing one GSH molecule covered by a schematic lid. The entry path for hydrophobic electrophiles from the membrane phase is shown (E). Membrane width is indicated by blue lines. Generated with Pymol from PDB entry 2H8A.
Scheme 1
Scheme 1
Scheme 2
Scheme 2
Scheme 3
Scheme 3
Scheme 4
Scheme 4
Scheme 5
Scheme 5

Similar articles

References

    1. Hayes JD, Flanagan JU, Jowsey IR. Glutathione transferases. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2005;45:51–88. - PubMed
    1. Hayes JD, Pulford DJ. The glutathione S-transferase supergene family: regulation of GST and the contribution of the isoenzymes to cancer chemoprotection and drug resistance. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 1995;30:445–600. - PubMed
    1. Higgins LG, Hayes JD. Mechanisms of induction of cytosolic and microsomal glutathione transferase (GST) genes by xenobiotics and pro-inflammatory agents. Drug Metab Rev. 2011;43:92–137. - PubMed
    1. Johansson K, Jarvliden J, Gogvadze V, Morgenstern R. Multiple roles of microsomal glutathione transferase 1 in cellular protection: a mechanistic study. Free Radic Biol Med. 2010;49:1638–1645. - PubMed
    1. Park HS, Nam SH, Lee JK, Yoon CN, Mannervik B, Benkovic SJ, Kim HS. Design and evolution of new catalytic activity with an existing protein scaffold. Science. 2006;311:535–538. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources