Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul 25;61(8):e00448-17.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.00448-17. Print 2017 Aug.

The Fluorocycline TP-271 Is Efficacious in Models of Aerosolized Francisella tularensis SCHU S4 Infection in BALB/c Mice and Cynomolgus Macaques

Affiliations

The Fluorocycline TP-271 Is Efficacious in Models of Aerosolized Francisella tularensis SCHU S4 Infection in BALB/c Mice and Cynomolgus Macaques

Trudy H Grossman et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. .

Abstract

TP-271 is a novel, fully synthetic fluorocycline in development for complicated bacterial respiratory infections. TP-271 was active in vitro against a panel of 29 Francisella tularensis isolates, showing MICs against 50% and 90% of isolates of 0.25 and 0.5 μg/ml, respectively. In a mouse model of inhalational tularemia, animals were exposed by aerosol to 91 to 283 50% lethal doses (LD50)/mouse of F. tularensis SCHU S4. Following 21 days of once-daily intraperitoneal dosing with TP-271 at 3, 6, 12, and 18 mg/kg of body weight/day, initiating at 24 h postchallenge, survival was 80%, 100%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. When treatment was initiated at 72 h postchallenge, survival was 89%, 100%, 100%, and 100% in the 3-, 6-, 12-, and 18-mg/kg/day TP-271 groups, respectively. No mice treated with the vehicle control survived. Surviving mice treated with TP-271 showed little to no relapse during 14 days posttreatment. In a nonhuman primate model of inhalational tularemia, cynomolgus macaques received an average aerosol exposure of 1,144 CFU of F. tularensis SCHU S4. Once-daily intravenous infusion with 1 or 3 mg/kg TP-271, or vehicle control, for 21 days was initiated within 6 h of confirmed fever. All animals treated with TP-271 survived to the end of the study, with no relapse during 14 days after the last treatment, whereas no vehicle control-treated animals survived. The protection and low relapse afforded by TP-271 treatment in these studies support continued investigation of TP-271 for use in the event of aerosolized exposure to F. tularensis.

Keywords: Francisella tularensis; TP-271; fluorocycline; tularemia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Efficacy of TP-271 in a postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) model of inhalational tularemia in mice. Antibiotic and vehicle control dosing initiated at 24 h postinfection. Survival plots for the 21-day dosing phase (A) and the 14-day posttreatment phase (B) are shown. The following dose groups were used: black line, 3 mg/kg/day TP-271; blue line, 6 mg/kg/day TP-271; burgundy line, 12 mg/kg/day TP-271; yellow line, 18 mg/kg/day TP-271; green line, 80 mg/kg/day doxycycline; red line, vehicle control. Lines at 100% survival are drawn staggered for visibility.
FIG 2
FIG 2
Efficacy of TP-271 in a treatment (Tx) model of inhalational tularemia in mice. Antibiotic and vehicle control dosing were initiated at 72 h postinfection. Survival plots for the 21-day dosing phase (A) and the 14-day posttreatment phase (B) are shown. The following dose groups were used: black line, 3 mg/kg/day TP-271; blue line, 6 mg/kg/day TP-271; burgundy line, 12 mg/kg/day TP-271; yellow line, 18 mg/kg/day TP-271; green line, 80 mg/kg/day doxycycline; red line, vehicle control. Lines at 100% survival are drawn staggered for visibility.
FIG 3
FIG 3
Efficacy of TP-271 in a treatment (Tx) model of inhalational tularemia in NHPs. TP-271 and vehicle control dosing initiated within 6 h of the onset of a confirmed fever as described in Materials and Methods. The following dose groups were used: black line, 3 mg/kg/day TP-271; blue line, 1 mg/kg/day TP-271; red line, vehicle control. Lines at 100% survival are drawn staggered for visibility.

References

    1. Pohanka M, Skladal P. 2009. Bacillus anthracis, Francisella tularensis and Yersinia pestis. The most important bacterial warfare agents–review. Folia Microbiol (Praha) 54:263–272. doi: 10.1007/s12223-009-0046-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dennis DT, Inglesby TV, Henderson DA, Bartlett JG, Ascher MS, Eitzen E, Fine AD, Friedlander AM, Hauer J, Layton M, Lillibridge SR, McDade JE, Osterholm MT, O'Toole T, Parker G, Perl TM, Russell PK, Tonat K. 2001. Tularemia as a biological weapon: medical and public health management. JAMA 285:2763–2773. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.21.2763. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ellis J, Oyston PC, Green M, Titball RW. 2002. Tularemia. Clin Microbiol Rev 15:631–646. doi: 10.1128/CMR.15.4.631-646.2002. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Evans ME, Friedlander AM. 1997. Tularemia, p 503–512. In Sidell FR, Takafuji ET, Franz DR (ed), Medical aspects of chemical and biological warfare. Office of the Surgeon General, U.S. Department of the Army, Bethesda, MD.
    1. Atlas RM. 2002. Bioterrorism: from threat to reality. Annu Rev Microbiol 56:167–185. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.56.012302.160616. - DOI - PubMed