Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec;18(2):109-130.

Interpreting the International Right to Health in a Human Rights-Based Approach to Health

Affiliations

Interpreting the International Right to Health in a Human Rights-Based Approach to Health

Paul Hunt. Health Hum Rights. 2016 Dec.

Abstract

This article tracks the shifting place of the international right to health, and human rights-based approaches to health, in the scholarly literature and United Nations (UN). From 1993 to 1994, the focus began to move from the right to health toward human rights-based approaches to health, including human rights guidance adopted by UN agencies in relation to specific health issues. There is a compelling case for a human rights-based approach to health, but it runs the risk of playing down the right to health, as evidenced by an examination of some UN human rights guidance. The right to health has important and distinctive qualities that are not provided by other rights-consequently, playing down the right to health can diminish rights-based approaches to health, as well as the right to health itself. Because general comments, the reports of UN Special Rapporteurs, and UN agencies' guidance are exercises in interpretation, I discuss methods of legal interpretation. I suggest that the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights permits distinctive interpretative methods within the boundaries established by the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. I call for the right to health to be placed explicitly at the center of a rights-based approach and interpreted in accordance with public international law and international human rights law.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. See Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) and UNAIDS. International guidelines on HIV/AIDS and human rights: 2006 Consolidated version. Geneva: OHCHR and UNAIDS; 2006.
    2. World Health Organization (WHO) Guidelines for social mobilization: A human rights approach to tuberculosis. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
    3. OHCHR, Technical guidance on the application of a human rights-based approach to the implementation of policies and programmes to reduce preventable maternal morbidity and mortality. UN Doc. A/HRC/21/22. 2012.
    4. OHCHR, Technical guidance on the application of a human rights based approach to the implementation of policies and programmes to reduce and eliminate preventable mortality and morbidity of children under 5 years of age. UN Doc. A/HRC/27/31. 2014.
    5. WHO. Ensuring human rights in the provision of contraceptive information and services: Guidance and recommendations. Geneva: WHO; 2014. - PubMed
    6. WHO. WHO guidelines on the management of health complications from female genital mutilation. Geneva: WHO; 2016. - PubMed
    1. Harrington J., Stuttaford M. “Introduction,”. In: Harrington J., Stuttaford M., editors. Global health and human rights: Legal and philosophical perspectives. London: Routledge; 2010. p. 5.
    1. Yamin A., Cantor R. “Between insurrectional discourse and operational guidance: Challenges and dilemmas in implementing human rights-based approaches to health,”. Journal of Human Rights Practice. 2014;6(3):453.
    1. WHO and OHCHR. A human rights-based approach to health. (n.d.)
    1. Bustreo F., Hunt P., Gruskin S., et al. Women’s and children’s health: Evidence of impact of human rights. Geneva: WHO; 2013. p. 20.

MeSH terms