Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May 26:10:137.
doi: 10.1186/s13068-017-0821-1. eCollection 2017.

Novel insight into the relationship between organic substrate composition and volatile fatty acids distribution in acidogenic co-fermentation

Affiliations

Novel insight into the relationship between organic substrate composition and volatile fatty acids distribution in acidogenic co-fermentation

Huijun Ma et al. Biotechnol Biofuels. .

Abstract

Background: Co-fermentation is an attractive technology for improving volatile fatty acids (VFAs) production by treatment of solid organic wastes. However, it remains unclear how the composition of different organic matters in solid waste influences the VFAs distribution, microbial community structure, and metabolic pathway during acidogenic co-fermentation. In this study, different organic wastes were added into waste activated sludge (WAS) as co-fermentation substrates to explore the impact of organic matter composition on VFAs pattern and the microbiological mechanism .

Results: Acetate was the most dominant VFA produced in all fermentation groups, making up 41.3-57.6% of the total VFAs produced during acidogenic co-fermentation under alkaline condition. With the increased addition of potato peel waste, the concentrations of propionate and valerate decreased dramatically, while ethanol and butyrate concentrations increased. The addition of food waste caused gradual decreases of valerate and propionate, but ethanol increased and butyrate was relatively stable. Some inconsistency was observed between hydrolysis efficiency and acidification efficiency. Our results revealed that starch was mainly responsible for butyrate and ethanol formation, while lipids and protein favored the synthesis of valerate and propionate. Microbial community analysis by high-throughput sequencing showed that Firmicutes had the highest relative abundance at phylum level in all fermentation groups. With 75% potato peel waste or 75% food waste addition to WAS, Bacilli (72.2%) and Clostridia (56.2%) were the dominant respective classes. In fermentation using only potato peel waste, the Bacilli content was 64.1%, while the Clostridia content was 53.6% in the food-only waste fermentation.

Conclusions: Acetate was always the dominant product in acidogenic co-fermentation, regardless of the substrate composition. The addition of carbon-rich substrates significantly enhanced butyrate and ethanol accumulation, while protein-rich substrate substantially benefited propionate and valerate generation. Potato peel waste substantially favored the enrichment of Bacilli, while food waste dramatically increased Clostridia content in the sludge.

Keywords: Acidogenic co-fermentation; Alkaline pH; Microbial community; Substrate composition; VFA distribution; Waste activated sludge.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The daily changes of ethanol and four single VFA concentrations during co-fermentation of WAS and potato peel waste (a), and WAS and food waste (b)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Consumption of different organic materials in the nine fermentation groups
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Plots and mathematic relationships between VFAs accumulation and consumption of lipids, starch, and protein during fermentation. ac Propionate accumulation; df butyrate accumulation; gi valerate accumulation
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
OTUs and the bacteria phylum distribution at the end of fermentation. a Venn diagram analysis of the OS, OP, OF, SP3, and SF3 experiment groups; b PCA of the OS, OP, OF, SP3, and SF3 experiment groups
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Taxonomic classification of sequences. a Bacterial communities of the OS, OP, OF, SP3, and SF3 experiment groups at class level and phylum level. b Hierarchical clustering analysis at genus level of bacterial communities of the OS, OP, OF, SP3, and SF3 fermentation groups
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
CCA analysis of the microbial communities and the organic composition between the OS, OP, OF, SP3, and SF3 fermentation groups
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
The synthetic pathways of propionate (a), valerate (b), butyrate (c), and acetate (d). Dotted arrows represent the transport pathway of substrate from extracellular environment to intracellular cytoplasm; solid arrows represent the synthetic pathway of single VFA. Arrows in different colors represent different synthetic pathways

References

    1. Nishio N, Nakashimada Y. Recent development of anaerobic digestion processes for energy recovery from wastes. J Biosci Bioeng. 2007;103:105–112. doi: 10.1263/jbb.103.105. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Appels L, Baeyens J, Degrève J, Dewil R. Principles and potential of the anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge. Prog Energy Combust Sci. 2008;34:755–781. doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2008.06.002. - DOI
    1. Wu H, Gao J, Yang D, Zhou Q, Liu W. Alkaline fermentation of primary sludge for short-chain fatty acids accumulation and mechanism. Chem Eng J. 2010;160:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2010.02.012. - DOI
    1. Sheng GP, Yu HQ, Li XY. Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) of microbial aggregates in biological wastewater treatment systems: a review. Biotechnol Adv. 2010;28:882–894. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.08.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen H, Wang D, Li X, Yang Q, Zeng G. Enhancement of post-anoxic denitrification for biological nutrient removal: effect of different carbon sources. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2015;22:5887–5894. doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-3755-1. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources