Validity and reliability of three-dimensional scanning compared to conventional anthropometry for children and adolescents: methodological mistake
- PMID: 28561816
- DOI: 10.1038/pr.2017.73
Validity and reliability of three-dimensional scanning compared to conventional anthropometry for children and adolescents: methodological mistake
Comment in
-
Response to Sabour.Pediatr Res. 2017 Aug;82(2):177. doi: 10.1038/pr.2017.76. Epub 2017 Jun 21. Pediatr Res. 2017. PMID: 28355196 No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Validity and intraobserver reliability of three-dimensional scanning compared with conventional anthropometry for children and adolescents from a population-based cohort study.Pediatr Res. 2017 May;81(5):736-744. doi: 10.1038/pr.2016.274. Epub 2017 Jan 4. Pediatr Res. 2017. PMID: 28052064
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
