Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1994 Dec;48(6):1973-1985.
doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb02227.x.

COSTS AND BENEFITS OF PLANT RESPONSES TO DISEASE: RESISTANCE AND TOLERANCE

Affiliations

COSTS AND BENEFITS OF PLANT RESPONSES TO DISEASE: RESISTANCE AND TOLERANCE

Ellen L Simms et al. Evolution. 1994 Dec.

Abstract

A major assumption of models of the evolution of plant resistance to disease is that plant resistance involves fitness costs. To test this assumption, a field experiment was performed so that a quantitative-genetic analysis could be used to detect fitness costs to Ipomoea purpurea of resistance to different fungal isolates of Colletotrichum dematium, a pathogenic fungus causing the disease anthracnose. This experiment yielded no evidence that resistance to anthracnose involves direct fitness costs. Nevertheless, trade-offs in plant fitness that were unrelated to resistance were detected between different disease environments. Tolerance, defined as the ability to compensate in part for fitness decrements caused by disease, was found to involve fitness costs. Halfsib families that were more tolerant of disease had lower fitness in the absence of disease. The possibility that the cost of tolerance could obscure fitness costs of resistance is explored.

Keywords: Coevolution; Colletotrichum dematium; Ipomoea purpurea; compensatory growth; herbivory; pathogen.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources