Complications associated with the use of flow-diverting devices for cerebral aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 28565981
- DOI: 10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS16450
Complications associated with the use of flow-diverting devices for cerebral aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to review the literature on the use of flow-diverting devices (FDDs) to treat intracranial aneurysms (IAs) and to investigate the safety and complications related to FDD treatment for IAs by performing a meta-analysis of published studies. METHODS A systematic electronic database search was conducted using the Springer, EBSCO, PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane databases on all accessible articles published up to January 2016, with no restriction on the publication year. Abstracts, full-text manuscripts, and the reference lists of retrieved articles were analyzed. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool the complication rates across studies. RESULTS Sixty studies were included, which involved retrospectively collected data on 3125 patients. The use of FDDs was associated with an overall complication rate of 17.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 13.6%-20.5%) and a low mortality rate of 2.8% (95% CI 1.2%-4.4%). The neurological morbidity rate was 4.5% (95% CI 3.2%-5.8%). No significant difference in the complication or mortality rate was observed between 2 commonly used devices (the Pipeline embolization device and the Silk flow-diverter device). A significantly higher overall complication rate was found in the case of ruptured IAs than in unruptured IA (odds ratio 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.3). CONCLUSIONS The use of FDDs in the treatment of IAs yielded satisfactory results with regard to complications and the mortality rate. The risk of complications should be considered when deciding on treatment with FDDs. Further studies on the mechanism underlying the occurrence of adverse events are required.
Keywords: BA = basilar artery; CI = confidence interval; FDD = flow-diverting device; IA = intracranial aneurysm; ISS = in-stent stenosis; MCA = middle cerebral artery; OR = odds ratio; PED = Pipeline embolization device; SAC = stent-assisted coiling; SAH = subarachnoid hemorrhage; complication; delayed rupture; flow-diverting device; intracranial aneurysm.
Comment in
-
Letter to the Editor. Complications from the use of flow-diverting devices.Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Mar;44(3):E10. doi: 10.3171/2017.11.FOCUS17694. Neurosurg Focus. 2018. PMID: 29490549 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Flow-Diverting Devices versus Coil Embolization for Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis.World Neurosurg. 2016 Apr;88:640-645. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.11.007. Epub 2015 Nov 14. World Neurosurg. 2016. PMID: 26585732
-
Efficacy of Flow-Diverting Devices for Cerebral Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.World Neurosurg. 2016 Jan;85:252-62. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.09.088. Epub 2015 Oct 3. World Neurosurg. 2016. PMID: 26434569
-
Endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms using flow-diverter devices: A systematic review.Neuroradiol J. 2015 Aug;28(4):365-75. doi: 10.1177/1971400915602803. Epub 2015 Aug 27. Neuroradiol J. 2015. PMID: 26314872 Free PMC article.
-
Endovascular Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms: To Use Stent(s) or Not? Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.World Neurosurg. 2016 Sep;93:271-8. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.06.014. Epub 2016 Jun 14. World Neurosurg. 2016. PMID: 27312391
-
Is clipping better than coiling in the treatment of patients with oculomotor nerve palsies induced by posterior communicating artery aneurysms? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2017 Feb;153:20-26. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.11.022. Epub 2016 Dec 11. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2017. PMID: 28006728
Cited by
-
Parent Artery Occlusion for Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysms: Results of the Japanese Registry of Neuroendovascular Therapy 3.Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2019 Jan 15;59(1):1-9. doi: 10.2176/nmc.st.2018-0190. Epub 2018 Dec 7. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2019. PMID: 30531152 Free PMC article.
-
Predictors of flow diverter stent in large and giant unruptured intracranial aneurysms, single-center experience.Neurol Sci. 2022 Nov;43(11):6399-6405. doi: 10.1007/s10072-022-06336-w. Epub 2022 Aug 19. Neurol Sci. 2022. PMID: 35984605 Free PMC article.
-
Endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: A retrospective long-term single center analysis.Neuroradiol J. 2023 Feb;36(1):76-85. doi: 10.1177/19714009221108678. Epub 2022 Jun 11. Neuroradiol J. 2023. PMID: 35695038 Free PMC article.
-
Pipeline embolization device in treating middle cerebral artery aneurysms: a single-center experience in 69 consecutive patients.Neuroradiology. 2025 May;67(5):1263-1272. doi: 10.1007/s00234-025-03606-0. Epub 2025 Apr 7. Neuroradiology. 2025. PMID: 40192847
-
Intracranial hemorrhagic events associated with flow diversion treatment: a retrospective analysis from a single academic institution.Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Jan 8;48(1):28. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-03171-9. Neurosurg Rev. 2025. PMID: 39776263
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical