Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May;5(9):195.
doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.03.91.

Video capsule colonoscopy in routine clinical practice

Affiliations

Video capsule colonoscopy in routine clinical practice

Ervin Toth et al. Ann Transl Med. 2017 May.

Abstract

Background: Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) offers direct mucosal visualisation without sedation or gas insufflation required in conventional colonoscopy (CC). However, evidence for the role of CCE as an adjunct or alternative to CC remains equivocal. In this observational cohort study, we report our experience of using CCE to investigate patients with suspected colon pathology at a tertiary referral centre.

Methods: From 2007-2015, consecutive patients requiring colonoscopy were recruited from a tertiary care centre in Malmo, Sweden. Data collected: patient demographics, indication for CCE, findings, bowel cleansing, colon transit time (CTT) and completeness of colon examination.

Results: Seventy-seven patients (57 F/20 F, median age 56 years) were included. The reason for CCE was previously incomplete or refused CC in 39 and 26 cases, and follow up of previous findings in 12 cases, respectively. The main clinical indications were gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding (n=28; 36%) and suspected inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or follow-up of known IBD (n=23; 30%). CCE was complete in 58/77 (75%) patients. In 3 patients the colon was not reached; in the other 16, the capsule reached the rectum (n=4), sigmoid (n=6), descending colon (n=5) and transverse colon (n=1). Findings were: normal CCE (n=15; 19%) colonic diverticula (n=29; 38%), polyps (n=17; 22%), active IBD (n=12; 16%), haemorrhoids (n=8; 10%), colonic angioectasia (n=4; 5%) and cancer (n=1; 1%). Small-bowel findings were recorded in 8 (10%) patients. All patients tolerated bowel preparation and CCE well. Two patients with an ulcerated small-bowel stricture and cancer respectively experienced temporary capsule retention with spontaneous resolution.

Conclusions: CCE is a well-tolerated alternative to CC, but requires technological improvement and optimisation of clinical practice to meet current reference standards. Although further technical development is required, CCE may complement or even replace CC for certain clinical indications.

Keywords: Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE); capsule colonoscopy; colorectal cancer (CRC); gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding; inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: Dr. Yung has received grant from Dr. Falk Pharma/Core and travel support from Dr. Falk Pharma; Dr. Koulaouzidis has received European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Given Imaging grant, material support for research from SynMed UK, honoraria from and member of advisory board for Dr. Falk Pharma UK and travel support from Almirall & Dr. Falk Pharma; Dr. Toth has received lecture fees from Given Imaging/Medtronic; Dr. Wurm Johansson has received lecture fees from Medtronic. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Capsule endoscopic images of colon. (A) Angioectasia; (B) diverticula; (C) ulcerative colitis; (D) hemorrhoids; (E) 3-mm-large diminutive polyp (hyperplastic); (F) 10-mm-large pedunculated polyp (tubular adenoma); (G) 22-mm-large sessile polyp (tubular adenoma); (H) stricturing malignant tumour (adenocarcinoma).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Capsule endoscopic images of small bowel. (A) Normal; (B) angioectasia; (C) 15-mm-large submucosal tumor (lipoma); (D) tattoo; (E) Crohn’s erosions; (F) Crohn’s ulcers; (G) Crohn’s stenosis; (H) ischemic ulcerated stenosis.

References

    1. Fisher DA, Maple JT, Ben-Menachem T, et al. Complications of colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;74:745-52. 10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.025 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carter D, Eliakim R. PillCam colon capsule endoscopy (PCCE) in colonic diseases. Ann Transl Med 2016;4:307. 10.21037/atm.2016.08.28 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee TJ, Rutter MD, Blanks RG, et al. Colonoscopy quality measures: experience from the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. Gut 2012;61:1050-7. 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300651 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Logan RF, Patnick J, Nickerson C, et al. Outcomes of the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) in England after the first 1 million tests. Gut 2012;61:1439-46. 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300843 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Doyle C, Lennox L, Bell D. A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness. BMJ Open 2013;3:e001570. 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001570 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources