INTERSPECIFIC LABORATORY COMPETITION OF THE RECENTLY SYMPATRIC SPECIES DROSOPHILA SUBOBSCURA AND DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA
- PMID: 28568145
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb05162.x
INTERSPECIFIC LABORATORY COMPETITION OF THE RECENTLY SYMPATRIC SPECIES DROSOPHILA SUBOBSCURA AND DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA
Abstract
-Drosophila subobscura and D. pseudoobscura are closely related species coexisting on the West Coast of North America, which was recently colonized by D. subobscura. In competition experiments with overlapping generations, D. subobscura is eliminated by D. pseudoobscura in a few generations at all four temperatures and two initial frequencies tested. Yet in one-species cultures, D. subobscura thrives at all experimental conditions. Single-generation competition experiments reveal lower survivorship and productivity of D. subobscura at all temperatures and frequencies. Productivity per female is dependent on the initial frequencies: greater for D. subobscura as its initial frequency becomes higher, but lower for D. pseudoobscura as its frequency becomes higher. Strains of D. subobscura from three disparate geographic origins yield similar results.
Keywords: Colonizing species; Drosophila pseudoobscura; Drosophila subobscura; competition between species; relative fitness.
© 1998 The Society for the Study of Evolution.
Similar articles
-
Preadult competition between colonizing populations of Drosophila subobscura and established populations of Drosophila simulans in Chile.Oecologia. 1983 Apr;58(1):137-140. doi: 10.1007/BF00384554. Oecologia. 1983. PMID: 28310659
-
Genetic variation in the spread of Drosophila subobscura from a nonequilibrium population.Evolution. 2000 Apr;54(2):696-703. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00071.x. Evolution. 2000. PMID: 10937245
-
Sexual isolation between North American and Bogota strains of Drosophila pseudoobscura.Behav Genet. 2012 May;42(3):472-82. doi: 10.1007/s10519-011-9517-7. Epub 2011 Nov 4. Behav Genet. 2012. PMID: 22065259
-
Postmating-prezygotic isolation is not an important source of selection for reinforcement within and between species in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.Evolution. 2005 May;59(5):1039-45. Evolution. 2005. PMID: 16136803
-
The chromosomal polymorphism of Drosophila subobscura: a microevolutionary weapon to monitor global change.Heredity (Edinb). 2009 Nov;103(5):364-7. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2009.86. Epub 2009 Jul 29. Heredity (Edinb). 2009. PMID: 19639003 Review.
Cited by
-
Distribution modelling of an introduced species: do adaptive genetic markers affect potential range?Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Sep 30;287(1935):20201791. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1791. Epub 2020 Sep 16. Proc Biol Sci. 2020. PMID: 32933443 Free PMC article.
-
Clinal patterns of desiccation and starvation resistance in ancestral and invading populations of Drosophila subobscura.Evol Appl. 2008 Aug;1(3):513-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2008.00040.x. Evol Appl. 2008. PMID: 25567732 Free PMC article.
-
Introduced Drosophila subobscura populations perform better than native populations during an oviposition choice task due to increased fecundity but similar learning ability.Ecol Evol. 2016 Feb 16;6(6):1725-36. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2015. eCollection 2016 Mar. Ecol Evol. 2016. PMID: 26925216 Free PMC article.
-
Divergent sensory investment mirrors potential speciation via niche partitioning across Drosophila.Elife. 2020 Jun 30;9:e57008. doi: 10.7554/eLife.57008. Elife. 2020. PMID: 32602834 Free PMC article.
-
Drosophila suzukii: the genetic footprint of a recent, worldwide invasion.Mol Biol Evol. 2014 Dec;31(12):3148-63. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu246. Epub 2014 Aug 25. Mol Biol Evol. 2014. PMID: 25158796 Free PMC article.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases