Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Nov;40(6):665-675.
doi: 10.1080/10790268.2017.1329076. Epub 2017 Jun 1.

Assessment and management of acute spinal cord injury: From point of injury to rehabilitation

Affiliations
Review

Assessment and management of acute spinal cord injury: From point of injury to rehabilitation

Laureen D Hachem et al. J Spinal Cord Med. 2017 Nov.

Abstract

Context: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating condition that can lead to significant neurological impairment and reduced quality of life. Despite advancements in our understanding of the pathophysiology and secondary injury mechanisms involved in SCI, there are currently very few effective treatments for this condition. The field, however, is rapidly changing as new treatments are developed and key discoveries are made.

Methods: In this review, we outline the pathophysiology, management, and long-term rehabilitation of individuals with traumatic SCI. We also provide an in-depth overview of emerging therapies along the spectrum of the translational pipeline.

Evidence synthesis: The concept of "time is spine" refers to the concept which emphasizes the importance of early transfer to specialized centers, early decompressive surgery, and early delivery of other treatments (e.g. blood pressure augmentation, methylprednisolone) to affect long-term outcomes. Another important evolution in management has been the recognition and prevention of the chronic complications of SCI including respiratory compromise, bladder dysfunction, Charcot joints, and pressure sores through directed interventions along with early integration of physical rehabilitation and mobilization. There have also been significant advances in neuroprotective and neuroregenerative strategies for SCI, many of which are actively in clinical trial including riluzole, Cethrin, stem cell transplantation, and the use of functional electrical stimulation.

Conclusion: Pharmacologic treatments, cell-based therapies, and other technology-driven interventions will likely play a combinatorial role in the evolving management of SCI as the field continues to evolve.

Keywords: Neuroprotection; Pathophysiology; Regeneration; Rehabilitation; Spinal cord injury; Stem cell; Surgical decompression; Treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Post-traumatic syringomyelia following T6–7 thoracic spinal cord injury. (A) Sagittal T2-weighted magnetic resonance image demonstrating evidence of an extensive syrinx (white arrowhead) within the cervical and thoracic cord extending as high as the cervico-medullary junction (black arrowhead). (B) Corresponding axial cut at the C3 level highlighting the ventral-dorsal and medial-lateral size of the syrinx
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Primary and secondary injuries of spinal cord injury. An initial primary physical insult initiates a rapid cascade of secondary biochemical injuries extending over the immediate, early acute and subacute phases. Figure adapted from Wilson et al..
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Overarching management goals at each stage following spinal cord injury. Each target must be considered within the broader care of an individual, coexisting polytrauma, and local resources. Time windows are a suggestion, however, the ‘Time is Spine’ concept should be emphasized as earlier initiation of treatments/prophylactic measures, when safe, may have beneficial effects

References

    1. Schoenfeld AJ, Laughlin MD, McCriskin BJ, Bader JO, Waterman BR, Belmont PJ Jr. Spinal injuries in United States military personnel deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan:an epidemiological investigation involving 7877 combat casualties from 2005 to 2009. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013;38(20):1770–8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31829ef226 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Szuflita NS, Neal CJ, Rosner MK, Frankowski RF, Grossman RG.. Spine injuries sustained by U.S. military personnel in combat are different from non-combat spine injuries. Mil Med 2016;181(10):1314–23. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00332 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blair JA, Patzkowski JC, Schoenfeld AJ, Cross Rivera JD, Grenier ES, Lehman RA, et al Are spine injuries sustained in battle truly different? Spine J 2012;12(9):824–29. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.09.012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bernstock JD, Caples CM, Wagner SC, Kang DG, Lehman RA Jr. Characteristics of combat-related spine injuries: a review of recent literature. Mil Med 2015;180(5):503–12. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00215 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tator CH, Fehlings MG.. Review of the secondary injury theory of acute spinal cord trauma with emphasis on vascular mechanisms. J Neurosurg 1991;75(1):15–26. doi: 10.3171/jns.1991.75.1.0015 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Grants and funding