Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jul;50(7):355-360.
doi: 10.5483/bmbrep.2017.50.7.062.

Structure, signaling and the drug discovery of the Ras oncogene protein

Affiliations
Review

Structure, signaling and the drug discovery of the Ras oncogene protein

Chang Woo Han et al. BMB Rep. 2017 Jul.

Abstract

Mutations in Ras GTPase are among the most common genetic alterations in human cancers. Despite extensive research investigating Ras proteins, their functions still remain a challenge over a long period of time. The currently available data suggests that solving the outstanding issues regarding Ras could lead to development of effective drugs that could have a significant impact on cancer treatment. Developing a better understanding of their biochemical properties or modes of action, along with improvements in their pharmacologic profiles, clinical design and scheduling will enable the development of more effective therapies. [BMB Reports 2017; 50(7): 355-360].

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflicting financial interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Regulation of Ras membrane association. (A) Ras protein with a CAAX motif at the carboxyl terminus undergoes three posttranslational modifications (PTMs). The first modification step is addition of an isoprenyl group to the cysteine of the CAAX motif by farnesyltransferase (FTase). Next, the isoprenylated CAAX protein becomes a substrate for Ras converting enzyme 1 (RCE1), which removes the last three amino acids (the -AAX of the CAAX motif) by endoproteolysis. Finally, the newly exposed isoprenylated cysteine residue is methylated by isoprenylcysteine carboxyl methyltransferase (ICMT). (B) After trafficking and association with the inner face of the plasma membrane, Ras proteins cycle between inactive GDP-bound and active GTP-bound states. Growth factors stimulate transient activation of Ras through activation of GEF. Ras-GTP binds preferentially to downstream effectors. GAP accelerates the intrinsic GTP hydrolysis activity, returning Ras to the inactive state.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Regulating signaling downstream of Ras. In the active GTP-bound state, Ras interacts with several families of effector proteins, resulting in stimulation of their catalytic activities. Raf protein kinases activate mitogen-activated protein kinase kinases 1 and 2 (MEK1 and MEK2), which leads to ERK1/2 activation. Phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3Ks) generate second-messenger lipids and activate numerous target proteins, including the survival signaling kinase AkT/PDK1. Ras binding activates Ral specific guanine-nucleotide-exchange factors (Ral-GEFs) by targeting them to their substrates, Ral GTPases, which are present in the plasma membrane. Phospholipase Cɛ (PLCɛ) catalyses the activation of protein kinase C (PKC) and mobilization of calcium from intracellular stores.

References

    1. Cox AD, Der CJ. Ras history: The saga continues. Small GTPases. 2010;1:2–27. doi: 10.4161/sgtp.1.1.12178. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Victor T, Du Toit R, Jordaan AM, Bester AJ, Van Helden PD. No evidence for point mutations in codons 12, 13, and 61 of the ras gene in a high-incidence area for esophageal and gastric cancers. Cancer Res. 1990;50:4911–4914. - PubMed
    1. Chang YS, Yeh KT, Hsu NC, et al. Detection of N-, H-, and KRAS codons 12, 13, and 61 mutations with universal RAS primer multiplex PCR and N-, H-, and KRAS-specific primer extension. Clin Biochem. 2010;43:296–301. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2009.10.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berns A. Kras and Hras—what is the difference? Nat Genet. 2008;40:1149–1150. doi: 10.1038/ng1008-1149. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eungdamrong NJ, Iyengar R. Computational approaches for modeling regulatory cellular networks. Trends Cell Biol. 2004;14:661–669. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2004.10.007. - DOI - PMC - PubMed