Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Jun 1;6(6):e005446.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.005446.

Recurrent Stroke in Minor Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack With Metabolic Syndrome and/or Diabetes Mellitus

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Recurrent Stroke in Minor Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack With Metabolic Syndrome and/or Diabetes Mellitus

Weiqi Chen et al. J Am Heart Assoc. .

Abstract

Background: We aimed to determine the risk conferred by metabolic syndrome (METS) and diabetes mellitus (DM) to recurrent stroke in patients with minor ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack from the CHANCE (Clopidogrel in High-risk patients with Acute Non-disabling Cerebrovascular Events) trial.

Methods and results: In total, 3044 patients were included. Patients were stratified into 4 groups: neither, METS only, DM only, or both. METS was defined using the Chinese Diabetes Society (CDS) and International Diabetes Foundation (IDF) definitions. The primary outcome was new stroke (including ischemic and hemorrhagic) at 90 days. A multivariable Cox regression model was used to assess the relationship of METS and DM status to the risk of recurrent stroke adjusted for potential covariates. Using the CDS criteria of METS, 53.2%, 17.2%, 19.8%, and 9.8% of patients were diagnosed as neither, METS only, DM only, and both, respectively. After 90 days of follow-up, there were 299 new strokes (293 ischemic, 6 hemorrhagic). Patients with DM only (16.1% versus 6.8%; adjusted hazard ratio 2.50, 95% CI 1.89-3.39) and both (17.1% versus 6.8%; adjusted hazard ratio 2.76, 95% CI 1.98-3.86) had significantly increased rates of recurrent stroke. No interaction effect of antiplatelet therapy by different METS or DM status for the risk of recurrent stroke (P=0.82 for interaction in the fully adjusted model of CDS) was observed. Using the METS (IDF) criteria demonstrated similar results.

Conclusions: Concurrent METS and DM was associated with an increased risk of recurrent stroke in patients with minor stroke and transient ischemic attack.

Keywords: diabetes mellitus; metabolic syndrome; prognosis; stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Adjusted hazard ratios of stroke recurrence according to METS (CDS and IDF) and DM status. A, METS defined by CDS. B, METS defined by IDF. Adjusted for age, sex, history of ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, angina, congestive heart failure, known atrial fibrillation or flutter, valvular heart disease, smoking status, index event and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale on admission, time to randomization, and antiplatelet therapy. CDS indicates Chinese Diabetes Society; DM, diabetes mellitus; IDF, International Diabetes Foundation; METS, metabolic syndrome.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ovbiagele B, Saver JL, Lynn MJ, Chimowitz M; WASID Study Group . Impact of metabolic syndrome on prognosis of symptomatic intracranial atherostenosis. Neurology. 2006;66:1344–1349. - PubMed
    1. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, Donato KA, Eckel RH, Franklin BA, Gordon DJ, Krauss RM, Savage PJ, Smith SC Jr, Spertus JA, Costa F; American Heart Association; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute . Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement. Circulation. 2005;112:2735–2752. - PubMed
    1. Xiang K, Ji L, Xiang H, Yang W, Jia W, Qian R, Weng J. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: a Chinese Diabetes Society Scientific Statement. Chin J Diabetes. 2004;12:156–161 (in Chinese).
    1. Ford ES, Giles WH, Dietz WH. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among US adults: findings from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. JAMA. 2002;287:356–359. - PubMed
    1. O'Neill S, O'Driscoll L. Metabolic syndrome: a closer look at the growing epidemic and its associated pathologies. Obes Rev. 2015;16:1–12. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources