Impact of creatinine methodology on glomerular filtration rate estimation in diabetes
- PMID: 28572883
- PMCID: PMC5437620
- DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v8.i5.222
Impact of creatinine methodology on glomerular filtration rate estimation in diabetes
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the influence of creatinine methodology on the performance of chronic kidney disease (CKD)-Epidemiology Collaboration Group-calculated estimated glomerular filtration rate (CKD-EPI-eGFR) for CKD diagnosis/staging in a large cohort of diabetic patients.
Methods: Fasting blood samples were taken from diabetic patients attending our clinic for their regular annual examination, including laboratory measurement of serum creatinine and eGFR.
Results: Our results indicated an overall excellent agreement in CKD staging (kappa = 0.918) between the Jaffé serum creatinine- and enzymatic serum creatinine-based CKD-EPI-eGFR, with 9% of discordant cases. As compared to the enzymatic creatinine, the majority of discordances (8%) were positive, i.e., associated with the more advanced CKD stage re-classification, whereas only 1% of cases were negatively discordant if Jaffé creatinine was used for eGFR calculation. A minor proportion of the discordant cases (3.5%) were re-classified into clinically relevant CKD stage indicating mildly to moderately decreased kidney function (< 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2). Significant acute and chronic hyperglycaemia, assessed as plasma glucose and HbA1c levels far above the recommended glycaemic goals, was associated with positively discordant cases. Due to a very low frequency, positive discordance is not likely to present a great burden for the health-care providers, while intensified medical care may actually be beneficial for the small number of discordant patients. On the other hand, a very low proportion of negatively discordant cases (1%) at the 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 eGFR level indicate a negligible possibility to miss the CKD diagnosis, which could be the most prominent clinical problem affecting patient care, considering high risk of CKD for adverse patient outcomes.
Conclusion: This study indicate that compensated Jaffé creatinine procedure, in spite of the glucose-dependent bias, is not inferior to enzymatic creatinine in CKD diagnosis/staging and therefore may provide a reliable and cost-effective tool for the renal function assessment in diabetic patients.
Keywords: Chronic kidney disease; Chronic kidney disease-Epidemiology Collaboration Group; Compensated Jaffé method; Creatinine; Diabetes; Enzymatic method; Estimated glomerular filtration rate; Impact.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict-of-interest statement: No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article are reported.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Enzymatic creatinine assays allow estimation of glomerular filtration rate in stages 1 and 2 chronic kidney disease using CKD-EPI equation.Clin Chim Acta. 2014 Jan 20;428:89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2013.11.002. Epub 2013 Nov 10. Clin Chim Acta. 2014. PMID: 24220551
-
Comparison between IDMS-traceable Jaffe and enzymatic creatinine assays for estimation of glomerular filtration rate by the CKD-EPI equation in healthy and diabetic subjects.Clin Biochem. 2013 Oct;46(15):1423-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2013.05.067. Epub 2013 Jun 5. Clin Biochem. 2013. PMID: 23747959
-
Interlaboratory Variability in Plasma Creatinine Measurement and the Relation with Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate and Chronic Kidney Disease Diagnosis.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Jan 6;12(1):29-37. doi: 10.2215/CJN.05400516. Epub 2016 Nov 8. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017. PMID: 27827312 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical and Analytical Impact of Moving from Jaffe to Enzymatic Serum Creatinine Methodology.J Appl Lab Med. 2020 Jul 1;5(4):631-642. doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfaa053. J Appl Lab Med. 2020. PMID: 32447368
-
Diabetic Nephropathy and CKD-Analysis of Individual Patient Serum Creatinine Trajectories: A Forgotten Diagnostic Methodology for Diabetic CKD Prognostication and Prediction.J Clin Med. 2015 Jun 26;4(7):1348-68. doi: 10.3390/jcm4071348. J Clin Med. 2015. PMID: 26239680 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of glomerular filtration rate estimation using Jaffé and enzymatic creatinine assays in diabetic patients.J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2019 Dec 2;18(2):551-556. doi: 10.1007/s40200-019-00462-7. eCollection 2019 Dec. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2019. PMID: 31890681 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of serum creatinine difference between the Jaffe and the enzymatic method on kidney disease detection and staging.Clin Kidney J. 2023 Aug 3;16(11):2147-2155. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfad178. eCollection 2023 Nov. Clin Kidney J. 2023. PMID: 37915891 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Difference in Serum Creatinine between Jaffe and Enzymatic Methods in Outpatient Kidney Transplant Recipients.J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 11;13(20):6066. doi: 10.3390/jcm13206066. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39458015 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic challenges of diabetic kidney disease.Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2023 Oct 15;33(3):030501. doi: 10.11613/BM.2023.030501. Epub 2023 Aug 5. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2023. PMID: 37545693 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Patient and Treatment Characteristics of Kidney Transplant Recipients with a Clinically Relevant Jaffe/Enzymatic Serum Creatinine Difference.J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 28;14(5):1668. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051668. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40095635 Free PMC article.
References
-
- International Diabetes Federation. Brussels: IDF; 2015. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 7th edition.
-
- National Kidney Foundation. KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney Int Suppl. 2013;3:1–150.
-
- American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes--2014. Diabetes Care. 2014;37 Suppl 1:S14–S80. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous