This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

Editorial

. 2017 May;44(3):177-178.

doi: 10.5999/aps.2017.44.3.177. Epub 2017 May 22.

Peer Review Processes and Desirable Attitudes for Peer Reviewers

Kyu Jin Chung¹

Affiliations

PMID: 28573090
PMCID: PMC5447525
DOI: 10.5999/aps.2017.44.3.177

Editorial

Peer Review Processes and Desirable Attitudes for Peer Reviewers

Kyu Jin Chung. Arch Plast Surg. 2017 May.

. 2017 May;44(3):177-178.

doi: 10.5999/aps.2017.44.3.177. Epub 2017 May 22.

Author

Kyu Jin Chung¹

Affiliation

¹ Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yeungnam University Hospital, Daegu, Korea.

PMID: 28573090
PMCID: PMC5447525
DOI: 10.5999/aps.2017.44.3.177

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Similar articles

Same review quality in open versus blinded peer review in "Ugeskrift for Læger".
Vinther S, Nielsen OH, Rosenberg J, Keiding N, Schroeder TV. Vinther S, et al. Dan Med J. 2012 Aug;59(8):A4479. Dan Med J. 2012. PMID: 22849979 Clinical Trial.
Attitudes toward blinding of peer review and perceptions of efficacy within a small biomedical specialty.
Jagsi R, Bennett KE, Griffith KA, DeCastro R, Grace C, Holliday E, Zietman AL. Jagsi R, et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Aug 1;89(5):940-946. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.04.021. Epub 2014 Jul 8. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014. PMID: 25035195
The peer review pilot project: a potential system to support GP appraisal in NHS Scotland?
Murie J, McCrae J, Bowie P. Murie J, et al. Educ Prim Care. 2009 Jan;20(1):34-40. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2009.11493759. Educ Prim Care. 2009. PMID: 19618650
'Peer review' for scientific manuscripts: Emerging issues, potential threats, and possible remedies.
Das AK. Das AK. Med J Armed Forces India. 2016 Apr;72(2):172-4. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2016.02.014. Epub 2016 Apr 16. Med J Armed Forces India. 2016. PMID: 27257328 Free PMC article. Review.
Peer review.
Livingston EH, Harwell JD. Livingston EH, et al. Am J Surg. 2001 Aug;182(2):103-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(01)00679-1. Am J Surg. 2001. PMID: 11574078 Review.

See all similar articles

Cited by

Peer review and roles of the reviewer.
Chung KJ. Chung KJ. Arch Craniofac Surg. 2019 Dec;20(6):345-346. doi: 10.7181/acfs.2019.00787. Epub 2019 Dec 20. Arch Craniofac Surg. 2019. PMID: 31914487 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

1. Kliewer MA, Freed KS, DeLong DM, et al. Reviewing the reviewers: comparison of review quality and reviewer characteristics at the American Journal of Roentgenology. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:1731–1735. - PubMed
1. Provenzale JM, Stanley RJ. A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185:848–854. - PubMed
1. Publishing Research Consortium. Peer review in scholarly journals: an international study into the perspective of the scholarly community [Internet] Bristol, UK: Mark Ware Consulting Ltd; 2017. [cited 2017 Feb 25]. Available from: http://publishingresearchconsortium.com/index.php/112-prc-projects/resea....
1. Lee SY. Tips on writing and reviewing articles as a non-english speaking medical doctor. Arch Plast Surg. 2015;42:1–3. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
- scite Smart Citations