Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul;176(7):837-847.
doi: 10.1007/s00431-017-2934-8. Epub 2017 Jun 1.

Minors and euthanasia: a systematic review of argument-based ethics literature

Affiliations

Minors and euthanasia: a systematic review of argument-based ethics literature

Giulia Cuman et al. Eur J Pediatr. 2017 Jul.

Abstract

Euthanasia was first legalised in the Netherlands in 2002, followed by similar legislation in Belgium the same year. Since the beginning, however, only the Netherlands included the possibility for minors older than 12 years to request euthanasia. In 2014, the Belgian Act legalising euthanasia was amended to include requests by minors who possess the capacity of discernment. This amendment sparked great debate, and raised difficult ethical questions about when and how a minor can be deemed competent. We conducted a systematic review of argument-based literature on euthanasia in minors. The search process followed PRISMA guidelines. Thirteen publications were included. The four-principle approach of medical ethics was used to organise the ethical arguments underlying this debate. The justification for allowing euthanasia in minors is buttressed mostly by the principles of beneficence and respect for autonomy. Somewhat paradoxically, both principles are also used in the literature to argue against the extension of legislation to minors. Opponents of euthanasia generally rely on the principle of non-maleficence.

Conclusion: The present analysis reveals that the debate surrounding euthanasia in minors is at an early stage. In order to allow a more in-depth ethical discussion, we suggest enriching the four-principle approach by including a care-ethics approach. What is Known: • The Netherlands and Belgium are the only two countries in the world with euthanasia legislation making it possible for minors to receive euthanasia. • This legislation provoked great debate globally, with ethical arguments for and against this legislation. What is New: • A systematic description of the ethical concepts and arguments grounding the debate on euthanasia in minors, as reported in the argument-based ethics literature. • A need has been identified to enrich the debate with a care-ethics approach to avoid oversimplifying the ethical decision-making process.

Keywords: End-of-life care; Ethics; Euthanasia; Minors; Paediatrics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lancet. 2014 Feb 22;383(9918):671-2 - PubMed
    1. J Bioeth Inq. 2016 Dec;13(4):525-534 - PubMed
    1. J Bioeth Inq. 2016 Jun;13(2):305-15 - PubMed
    1. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010 Jun;164(6):547-53 - PubMed
    1. Arch Dis Child. 2014 Sep;99(9):798-9 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources