Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2017 Sep;475(9):2194-2201.
doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5396-4. Epub 2017 Jun 1.

Periprosthetic Joint Infection Is the Main Cause of Failure for Modern Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 11,134 Knees

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Periprosthetic Joint Infection Is the Main Cause of Failure for Modern Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 11,134 Knees

Chuan Kong Koh et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Although large series from national joint registries may accurately reflect indications for revision TKAs, they may lack the granularity to detect the true incidence and relative importance of such indications, especially periprosthetic joint infections (PJI).

Questions/purposes: Using a combination of individual chart review supplemented with New Zealand Joint Registry data, we asked: (1) What is the cumulative incidence of revision TKA? (2) What are the common indications for revising a contemporary primary TKA? (3) Do revision TKA indications differ at various followup times after primary TKA?

Methods: We identified 11,134 primary TKAs performed between 2000 and 2015 in three tertiary referral hospitals. The New Zealand Joint Registry and individual patient chart review were used to identify 357 patients undergoing subsequent revision surgery or any reoperation for PJI. All clinical records, radiographs, and laboratory results were reviewed to identify the primary revision reason. The cumulative incidence of each revision reason was calculated using a competing risk estimator.

Results: The cumulative incidence for revision TKA at 15 years followup was 6.1% (95% CI, 5.1%-7.1%). The two most-common revision reasons at 15 years followup were PJI followed by aseptic loosening. The risk of revision or reoperation for PJI was 2.0% (95% CI, 1.7%-2.3%) and aseptic loosening was 1.2% (95% CI, 0.7%-1.6%). Approximately half of the revision TKAs secondary to PJI occurred within 2 years of the index TKA (95% CI, 0.8%-1.2%), whereas half of the revision TKAs secondary to aseptic loosening occurred 8 years after the index TKA (95% CI, 0.4%-0.7%).

Conclusions: In this large cohort of patients with comprehensive followup of revision procedures, PJI was the dominant reason for failure during the first 15 years after primary TKA. Aseptic loosening became more important with longer followup. Efforts to improve outcome after primary TKA should focus on these areas, particularly prevention of PJI.

Level of evidence: Level III, therapeutic study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The cumulative incidences for the top five most-common reasons for revision TKAs are presented. The order from most-common to least-common revision reasons are (1) periprosthetic joint infection, (2) aseptic loosening, (3) patellofemoral arthrosis, (4) instability, and (5) stiffness.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The annual incidence of periprosthetic joint infection versus aseptic loosening and polyethylene wear is shown.

Comment in

References

    1. Australian Orthopaedic Association. National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual Report 2015 - Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. Available at: https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/en/annual-reports-2015. Accessed May 25, 2016.
    1. Barr CJ, Barbalace RJ, Wessinger SJ, Bragdon CR, Kwon YM, Malchau H. Validation of a hospital-based joint registry: quantification of errors and maximizing utility. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27:1766–1771. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.04.028. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB, Faris PM, Keating EM, Redelman R, Faris GW, Davis KE. Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:26–434. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000148578.22729.0e. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Braun TM, Yuan Z. Comparing the small sample performance of several variance estimators under competing risks. Stat Med. 2007;26:1170–1180. doi: 10.1002/sim.2661. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dalury DF, Pomeroy DL, Gorab RS, Adams MJ. Why are total knee arthroplasties being revised? J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(8 suppl):120–121. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.04.051. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms