Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jun;120(6):472-485.
doi: 10.1007/s00113-017-0362-x.

[Prevention of postoperative infections : Risk factors and the current WHO guidelines in musculoskeletal surgery]

[Article in German]
Affiliations
Review

[Prevention of postoperative infections : Risk factors and the current WHO guidelines in musculoskeletal surgery]

[Article in German]
Christian Willy et al. Unfallchirurg. 2017 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Despite the many scientific and technological advances postoperative infection continues to be a large problem for trauma and orthopedic surgeons. Based on a review of the current literature, this study provides a comprehensive overview of the risk factors (RF) and possible preventive measures to control surgical site infections.

Methods: Medline search and analysis from 1968-2017 (as of 01 March 2017). Selection of trauma and orthopedic relevant RFs and comparison with WHO recommendations (global guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infection, Nov. 2016).

Results: Identification of 858 relevant articles from the last 50 years (1968-2017). Pooled postoperative rate of infection is 0.3% (hand surgery) and 19% (3rd degree open fractures). For open fractures, there is no clear tendency towards lower infection rates during the past five decades. Identification of 115 RF from three areas (patient-dependent RF, organizational and procedural RF, trauma- and surgery-dependent RF). The five most important RFs are body mass index over 35 kg/m2, increased duration of surgery, diabetes mellitus, increased blood glucose levels in the perioperative period also in the case of nondiabetic patients, and errors in the perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis.

Discussion: Inconsistent definition of "infection", interaction of the RF and the different follow-up duration limit the meaningfulness of the study.

Conclusion: In the future, considerable efforts must be made in order to achieve a noticeable reduction in the rate of infection, especially in the case of high-risk patients.

Keywords: Antibiotic prophylaxis; Infection avoidance; Infection pathogens; Infection rates, postoperative; Open fractures.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Injury. 2009 Nov;40(11):1147-50 - PubMed
    1. J Orthop Trauma. 2013 Jan;27(1):6-10 - PubMed
    1. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012 Nov;33(11):1086-93 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976 Jun;58(4):453-8 - PubMed
    1. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2015 Jun;16(3):333-7 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources