Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017:1628:283-291.
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7116-9_23.

Evaluation of Ebola Virus Countermeasures in Guinea Pigs

Affiliations

Evaluation of Ebola Virus Countermeasures in Guinea Pigs

Andrea Marzi. Methods Mol Biol. 2017.

Abstract

Ebola virus (EBOV) pathology in humans remains incompletely understood; therefore, a number of rodent and nonhuman primate (NHP) models have been established to study the disease caused by this virus. While the macaque model most accurately recapitulates human disease, rodent models, which display only certain aspects of human disease but are more cost-effective, are widely used for initial screens during EBOV countermeasure development. In particular, mice and guinea pigs were among the first species used for the efficacy testing of EBOV vaccines and therapeutics. While mice have low predictive value, guinea pigs have proven to be a more reliable predictor for the evaluation of countermeasures in NHPs. In addition, guinea pigs are larger in size compared to mice, allowing for more frequent collection of blood samples at larger volumes. However, guinea pigs have the disadvantage that there is only a limited pool of immunological tools available to characterize host responses to vaccination, treatment and infection. In this chapter, the efficacy testing of an EBOV vaccine and a therapeutic in the guinea pig model are described.

Keywords: Animal model; Countermeasures; Ebola virus; Guinea pigs; In vivo experiment; Therapeutics; Vaccines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Blood sample collection from the anterior vena cava. The animal is laid on its back under isolfurane anesthesia via a nose cone. The needle is not fully inserted at about a 45° angle to the sternum (top panel, top view) and a 30–45° angle to the guinea pig (bottom panel, side view) for a slow blood draw from the anterior vena cava (up to 1 mL)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Safronetz D, Geisbert TW, Feldmann H (2013) Animal models for highly pathogenic emerging viruses. Curr Opin Virol 3(2):205–209. doi:10.1016/j.coviro.2013.01.001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bowen ET, Lloyd G, Harris WJ, Platt GS, Baskerville A, Vella EE (1977) Viral haemorrhagic fever in southern Sudan and northern Zaire. Preliminary studies on the aetiological agent. Lancet 1(8011):571–573 - PubMed
    1. Marzi A, Ebihara H, Callison J, Groseth A, Williams KJ, Geisbert TW, Feldmann H (2011) Vesicular stomatitis virus-based Ebola vaccines with improved cross-protective efficacy. J Infect Dis 204(Suppl 3):S1066–S1074. doi:10.1093/infdis/jir348 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Connolly BM, Steele KE, Davis KJ, Geisbert TW, Kell WM, Jaax NK, Jahrling PB (1999) Pathogenesis of experimental Ebola virus infection in guinea pigs. J Infect Dis 179(Suppl 1):S203–S217. doi:10.1086/514305 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cross RW, Fenton KA, Geisbert JB, Mire CE, Geisbert TW (2015) Modeling the disease course of Zaire ebolavirus infection in the outbred Guinea pig. J Infect Dis 212(Suppl 2):S305–S315. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiv237 - DOI - PubMed