Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2017 Jun 2;6(6):CD011670.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011670.pub2.

Early versus delayed appendicectomy for appendiceal phlegmon or abscess

Yao Cheng  1 , Xianze Xiong, Jiong Lu, Sijia Wu, Rongxing Zhou, Nansheng Cheng
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Early versus delayed appendicectomy for appendiceal phlegmon or abscess

Yao Cheng et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Update in

Abstract

Background: Appendiceal phlegmon and abscess account for 2% to 10% of acute appendicitis. People with appendiceal phlegmon or abscess usually need an appendicectomy to relieve their symptoms and avoid complications. The timing of appendicectomy for appendiceal phlegmon or abscess is controversial.

Objectives: To assess the effects of early versus delayed appendicectomy for appendiceal phlegmon or abscess, in terms of overall morbidity and mortality.

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL; 2016, Issue 7), MEDLINE Ovid (1950 to 23 August 2016), Embase Ovid (1974 to 23 August 2016), Science Citation Index Expanded (1900 to 23 August 2016), and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) (1978 to 23 August 2016). We also searched the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform search portal (23 August 2016) and ClinicalTrials.gov (23 August 2016) for ongoing trials.

Selection criteria: We included all individual and cluster-randomised controlled trials, irrespective of language, publication status, or age of participants, comparing early versus delayed appendicectomy in people with appendiceal phlegmon or abscess.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently identified the trials for inclusion, collected the data, and assessed the risk of bias. We performed meta-analyses using Review Manager 5. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and the mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Main results: We included two randomised controlled trials with a total of 80 participants in this review. 1. Early versus delayed open appendicectomy for appendiceal phlegmonForty participants (paediatric and adults) with appendiceal phlegmon were randomised either to early appendicectomy (appendicectomy as soon as appendiceal mass resolved within the same admission) (n = 20), or to delayed appendicectomy (initial conservative treatment followed by interval appendicectomy six weeks later) (n = 20). The trial was at high risk of bias. There was no mortality in either group. There is insufficient evidence to determine the effect of using either early or delayed open appendicectomy onoverall morbidity (RR 13.00; 95% CI 0.78 to 216.39; very low-quality evidence), the proportion of participants who developed wound infection (RR 9.00; 95% CI 0.52 to 156.91; very low quality evidence) or faecal fistula (RR 3.00; 95% CI 0.13 to 69.52; very low quality evidence). The quality of evidence for increased length of hospital stay and time away from normal activities in the early appendicectomy group (MD 6.70 days; 95% CI 2.76 to 10.64, and MD 5.00 days; 95% CI 1.52 to 8.48, respectively) is very low quality evidence. The trial reported neither quality of life nor pain outcomes. 2. Early versus delayed laparoscopic appendicectomy for appendiceal abscessForty paediatric participants with appendiceal abscess were randomised either to early appendicectomy (emergent laparoscopic appendicectomy) (n = 20) or to delayed appendicectomy (initial conservative treatment followed by interval laparoscopic appendicectomy 10 weeks later) (n = 20). The trial was at high risk of bias. The trial did not report on overall morbidity or complications. There was no mortality in either group. We do not have sufficient evidence to determine the effects of using either early or delayed laparoscopic appendicectomy for outcomes relating to hospital stay between the groups (MD -0.20 days; 95% CI -3.54 to 3.14; very low quality of evidence). Health-related quality of life was measured with the Pediatric Quality of Life Scale-Version 4.0 questionnaire (a scale of 0 to 100 with higher values indicating a better quality of life). Health-related quality of life score measured at 12 weeks after appendicectomy was higher in the early appendicectomy group than in the delayed appendicectomy group (MD 12.40 points; 95% CI 9.78 to 15.02) but the quality of evidence was very low. This trial reported neither the pain nor the time away from normal activities.

Authors' conclusions: It is unclear whether early appendicectomy prevents complications compared to delayed appendicectomy for people with appendiceal phlegmon or abscess. The evidence indicating increased length of hospital stay and time away from normal activities in people with early open appendicectomy is of very low quality. The evidence for better health-related quality of life following early laparoscopic appendicectomy compared with delayed appendicectomy is based on very low quality evidence. For both comparisons addressed in this review, data are sparse, and we cannot rule out significant benefits or harms of early versus delayed appendicectomy.Further trials on this topic are urgently needed and should specify a set of criteria for use of antibiotics, percutaneous drainage of the appendiceal abscess prior to surgery and resolution of the appendiceal phlegmon or abscess. Future trials should include outcomes such as time away from normal activities, quality of life and the length of hospital stay.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Cheng Y: none known.

Xiong X: none known.

Lu J: none known.

Wu S: none known.

Zhou R: none known.

Cheng N: none known.

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram.
2
2
Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
3
3
Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

References to studies included in this review

Kumar 2004 {published data only}
    1. Kumar S, Jain S. Treatment of appendiceal mass: prospective, randomized clinical trial. Indian Journal of Gastroenterology 2004;23(5):165‐7. - PubMed
St Peter 2010 {published data only}
    1. Schurman JV, Cushing CC, Garey CL, Laituri CA, Peter SD. Quality of life assessment between laparoscopic appendectomy at presentation and interval appendectomy for perforated appendicitis with abscess: analysis of a prospective randomized trial. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2011;46(6):1121‐5. - PubMed
    1. Peter SD, Aguayo P, Fraser JD, Keckler SJ, Sharp SW, Leys CM, et al. Initial laparoscopic appendectomy versus initial nonoperative management and interval appendectomy for perforated appendicitis with abscess: a prospective, randomized trial. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2010;45(1):236‐40. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Aranda‐Narváez 2010 {published data only}
    1. Aranda‐Narváez JM, González‐Sánchez AJ, Marín‐Camero N, Montiel‐Casado C, López‐Ruiz P, Sánchez‐Pérez B. Conservative approach versus urgent appendectomy in surgical management of acute appendicitis with abscess or phlegmon. Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas 2010;102(11):648‐52. - PubMed
Bahram 2011 {published data only}
    1. Bahram MA. Evaluation of early surgical management of complicated appendicitis by appendicular mass. International Journal of Surgery 2011;9(1):101‐3. - PubMed
Blakely 2011 {published data only}
    1. Blakely ML, Williams R, Dassinger MS, Eubanks JW 3rd, Fischer P, Huang EY, et al. Early vs interval appendectomy for children with perforated appendicitis. Archives of Surgery 2011;146(6):660‐5. - PubMed
    1. Myers AL, Williams RF, Giles K, Waters TM, Eubanks JW 3rd, Hixson SD, et al. Hospital cost analysis of a prospective, randomized trial of early vs interval appendectomy for perforated appendicitis in children. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2012;214(4):427‐34. - PubMed
Erdoğan 2005 {published data only}
    1. Erdoğan D, Karaman I, Narci A, Karaman A, Cavuşoğlu YH, Aslan MK, et al. Comparison of two methods for the management of appendicular mass in children. Pediatric Surgery International 2005;21(2):81‐3. - PubMed
Goh 2005 {published data only}
    1. Goh BK, Chui CH, Yap TL, Low Y, Lama TK, Alkouder G, et al. Is early laparoscopic appendectomy feasible in children with acute appendicitis presenting with an appendiceal mass? A prospective study. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2005;40(7):1134‐7. - PubMed
Handa 1997 {published data only}
    1. Handa N, Muramori K, Taguchi S. Early appendectomy versus an interval appendectomy for appendiceal abscess in children. Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi 1997;88(12):389‐94. - PubMed
Senapathi 2002 {published data only}
    1. Senapathi PS, Bhattacharya D, Ammori BJ. Early laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicular mass. Surgical Endoscopy 2002;16(12):1783‐5. - PubMed
Weber 2003 {published data only}
    1. Weber TR, Keller MA, Bower RJ, Spinner G, Vierling K. Is delayed operative treatment worth the trouble with perforated appendicitis is children?. The American Journal of Surgery 2003;186(6):685‐8. - PubMed

Additional references

Addiss 1990
    1. Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. American Journal of Epidemiology 1990;132(5):910‐25. - PubMed
Ahmed 2005
    1. Ahmed I, Deakin D, Parsons SL. Appendix mass: do we know how to treat it?. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 2005;87(3):191‐5. - PMC - PubMed
Andersen 2005
    1. Andersen BR, Kallehave FL, Andersen HK. Antibiotics versus placebo for prevention of postoperative infection after appendicectomy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001439.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Anderson 2012
    1. Anderson JE, Bickler SW, Chang DC, Talamini MA. Examining a common disease with unknown etiology: trends in epidemiology and surgical management of appendicitis in California, 1995‐2009. World Journal of Surgery 2012;36(12):2787‐94. - PubMed
Andersson 1994
    1. Andersson R, Hugander A, Thulin A, Nyström PO, Olaison G. Indications for operation in suspected appendicitis and incidence of perforation. BMJ 1994;308(6921):107‐10. - PMC - PubMed
Andersson 2007
    1. Andersson RE, Petzold MG. Nonsurgical treatment of appendiceal abscess or phlegmon: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Annals of Surgery 2007;246(5):741‐8. - PubMed
Andreu‐Ballester 2009
    1. Andreu‐Ballester JC, González‐Sánchez A, Ballester F, Almela‐Quilis A, Cano‐Cano MJ, Millan‐Scheiding M, et al. Epidemiology of appendectomy and appendicitis in the Valencian community (Spain), 1998‐2007. Digestive Surgery 2009;26(5):406‐12. - PubMed
Boomer 2010
    1. Boomer L, Freeman J, Landrito E, Feliz A. Perforation in adults with acute appendicitis linked to insurance status, not ethnicity. Journal of Surgical Research 2010;163(2):221‐4. - PubMed
Buckius 2012
    1. Buckius MT, McGrath B, Monk J, Grim R, Bell T, Ahuja V. Changing epidemiology of acute appendicitis in the United States: study period 1993–2008. Journal of Surgical Research 2012;175(2):185‐90. - PubMed
Cheng 2012
    1. Cheng Y, Xiong XZ, Wu SJ, Lin YX, Cheng NS. Laparoscopic vs. open cholecystectomy for cirrhotic patients: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Hepatogastroenterology 2012;59(118):1727‐34. - PubMed
Cheng 2013
    1. Cheng Y, Lu J, Xiong X, Wu S, Lin Y, Wu T, et al. Gases for establishing pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009569.pub2] - DOI - PubMed
Cheng 2015a
    1. Cheng Y, Zhou S, Zhou R, Lu J, Wu S, Xiong X, et al. Abdominal drainage to prevent intra‐peritoneal abscess after open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010168.pub2] - DOI - PubMed
Cheng 2015b
    1. Cheng Y, Xiong X, Lu J, Wu S, Zhou R, Lin Y, et al. Early versus delayed appendicectomy for appendiceal phlegmon or abscess. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011670] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Cirocchi 2008
    1. Cirocchi R, Morelli U, La Mura F, Cattorini L, Napolitano V, Galanov I, et al. Acute appendicitis: a descending trend?. Minerva Chirurgica 2008;63(2):109‐13. - PubMed
Clavien 2009
    1. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, et al. The Clavien‐Dindo classification of surgical complications: five‐year experience. Annals of Surgery 2009;250(2):187‐96. - PubMed
Cueto 2006
    1. Cueto J, D'Allemagne B, Vázquez‐Frias JA, Gomez S, Delgado F, Trullenque L, et al. Morbidity of laparoscopic surgery for complicated appendicitis: an international study. Surgical Endoscopy 2006;20(5):717‐20. - PubMed
Deeks 2011
    1. Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG (editors). Chapter 9: Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Deelder 2014
    1. Deelder JD, Richir MC, Schoorl T, Schreurs WH. How to treat an appendiceal inflammatory mass: operatively or nonoperatively?. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2014;18(4):641‐5. - PubMed
Egger 1997
    1. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta‐analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315(7109):629‐34. - PMC - PubMed
Endnote X7 [Computer program]
    1. Thomson Reuters. Endnote X7. Thomson Reuters, 2014.
Frazee 1996
    1. Frazee RC, Bohannon WT. Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. Archives of Surgery 1996;31(5):509‐11. - PubMed
Gillick 2001
    1. Gillick J, Velayudham M, Puri P. Conservative management of appendix mass in children. British Journal of Surgery 2001;88(11):1539‐42. - PubMed
Hall 2010
    1. Hall MJ, DeFrances CJ, Williams SN, Golosinskiy A, Schwartzman A. National Hospital Discharge Survey: 2007 summary. National Health Statistics Reports 2010;26(29):1‐20, 24. - PubMed
Higgins 2011
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Kang 2000
    1. Kang KJ, Lim TJ, Kim YS. Laparoscopic appendectomy is feasible for the complicated appendicitis. Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques 2000;10(6):364‐7. - PubMed
Körner 1997
    1. Körner H, Söndenaa K, Söreide JA, Andersen E, Nysted A, Lende TH, et al. Incidence of acute non‐perforated and perforated appendicitis: age‐specific and sex‐specific analysis. World Journal of Surgery 1997;21(3):313‐7. - PubMed
Lee 2010
    1. Lee JH, Park YS, Choi JS. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in South Korea: national registry data. Journal of Epidemiology 2010;20(2):97‐105. - PMC - PubMed
Livingston 2007
    1. Livingston EH, Woodward WA, Sarosi GA, Haley RW. Disconnect between incidence of non‐perforated and perforated appendicitis: implications for pathophysiology and management. Annals of Surgery 2007;245(6):886‐92. - PMC - PubMed
Markides 2010
    1. Markides G, Subar D, Riyad K. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults with complicated appendicitis: systematic review and meta‐analysis. World Journal of Surgery 2010;34(9):2026‐40. - PubMed
Nitecki 1993
    1. Nitecki S, Assalia A, Schein M. Contemporary management of the appendiceal mass. British Journal of Surgery 1993;80(1):18‐20. - PubMed
Oliak 2000
    1. Oliak D, Yamini D, Udani VM, Lewis RJ, Vargas H, Arnell T, et al. Can perforated appendicitis be diagnosed preoperatively based on admission factors?. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2000;4(5):470‐4. - PubMed
Pieper 1982
    1. Pieper R, Kager L. The incidence of acute appendicitis and appendectomy. An epidemiological study of 971 cases. Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica 1982;148(1):45‐9. - PubMed
Rehman 2011
    1. Rehman H, Rao AM, Ahmed I. Single incision versus conventional multi‐incision appendicectomy for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 7. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009022.pub2] - DOI - PubMed
RevMan 2014 [Computer program]
    1. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
Salminen 2015
    1. Salminen P, Paajanen H, Rautio T, Nordström P, Aarnio M, Rantanen T, et al. Antibiotic therapy vs appendectomy for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: the APPAC randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2015;313(23):2340‐8. - PubMed
Santacroce 2012
    1. Santacroce L, Geibel J, Ochoa JB, Hines OJ, Talavera F. Appendectomy. 2011. emedicine.medscape.com/article/195778‐overview (accessed 31 December 2012).
Sauerland 2010
    1. Sauerland S, Jaschinski T, Neugebauer EAM. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 10. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001546.pub3] - DOI - PubMed
Schünemann 2009
    1. Schünemann H, Brozek J, Oxman A, editors. GRADE handbook for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendation (updated March 2009). The GRADE Working Group, 2009. Available from www.cc‐ims.net/gradepro.
Shipsey 1985
    1. Shipsey MR, O'Donnell B. Conservative management of appendix mass in children. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 1985;67(1):23‐4. - PMC - PubMed
Simillis 2010
    1. Simillis C, Symeonides P, Shorthouse AJ, Tekkis PP. A meta‐analysis comparing conservative treatment versus acute appendectomy for complicated appendicitis (abscess or phlegmon). Surgery 2010;147(6):818‐29. - PubMed
Sterne 2011
    1. Sterne JAC, Egger M, Moher D (editors). Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Vons 2011
    1. Vons C, Barry C, Maitre S, Pautrat K, Leconte M, Costaglioli B, et al. Amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid versus appendicectomy for treatment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis: an open‐label, non‐inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2011;377(9777):1573‐9. - PubMed
Willemsen 2002
    1. Willemsen PJ, Hoorntje LE, Eddes EH, Ploeg RJ. The need for interval appendectomy after resolution of an appendiceal mass questioned. Digestive Surgery 2002;19(3):216‐20. - PubMed
Williams 1998
    1. Williams NM, Jackson D, Everson NW, Johnstone JM. Is the incidence of acute appendicitis really falling?. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 1998;80(2):122‐4. - PMC - PubMed
Wilms 2011
    1. Wilms IMHA, Hoog DENM, Visser DC, Janzing HMJ. Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 11. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008359.pub2] - DOI - PubMed
Yau 2007
    1. Yau KK, Siu WT, Tang CN, Yang GP, Li MK. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2007;205(1):60‐5. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources