Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May/Jun;15(3):296-302.
doi: 10.1089/hs.2016.0120. Epub 2017 Jun 2.

Why Gene Editors Like CRISPR/Cas May Be a Game-Changer for Neuroweapons

Why Gene Editors Like CRISPR/Cas May Be a Game-Changer for Neuroweapons

Diane DiEuliis et al. Health Secur. 2017 May/Jun.

Abstract

This year marks the Eighth Review Conference (RevCon) of the Biological Toxins and Weapons Convention (BWC). At the same time, ongoing international efforts to further and more deeply investigate the brain's complex neuronal circuitry are creating unprecedented capabilities to both understand and control neurological processes of thought, emotion, and behavior. These advances have tremendous promise for human health, but the potential for their misuse has also been noted, with most discussions centering on research and development of agents that are addressed by existing BWC and Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) proscriptions. In this article, we discuss the dual-use possibilities fostered by employing emergent biotechnologic techniques and tools-specifically, novel gene editors like clustered regular interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-to produce neuroweapons. Based on our analyses, we posit the strong likelihood that development of genetically modified or created neurotropic substances will advance apace with other gene-based therapeutics, and we assert that this represents a novel-and realizable-path to creating potential neuroweapons. In light of this, we propose that it will be important to re-address current categorizations of weaponizable tools and substances, so as to better inform and generate tractable policy to enable improved surveillance and governance of novel neuroweapons.

Keywords: Biosecurity policy; CRISPR; Dual-use neuroscience; Gene editing; Neurotherapeutic pathways; Neuroweapon.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Pathway Spectrum Across Potential Weapon Agents. This diagram provides a schematic of traditional weapons pathways, with a new distinction realized through gene editing in the central shaded sphere.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Gene Editing's Potential Impacts on the Brain. Gene editing technologies will enable both modification of entities which can affect brain function (indirect affectors) and also lead to functional gene discovery and modeling that can create entities that alter structure and function of brain cells (eg, neurons and glia). In either case, the goals will be to alter neurophysiologic, cognitive-emotional, and/or behavioral states. These approaches can be employed to engender novel neurotherapeutics and/or neuroweapons.

References

    1. Giordano J, Forsythe C, Olds J. Neuroscience, neurotechnology, and national security: the need for preparedness and an ethics of responsible action. AJOB - Neuroscience 2010;1(2):1-3
    1. Giordano J, Wurzman R. Neurotechnologies as weapons in national intelligence and defense. Synesis: A Journal of Science, Technology, Ethics and Policy 2011;2:138-151
    1. Forsythe C, Giordano J. On the need for neurotechnology in the national intelligence and defense agenda: scope and trajectory. Synesis: A Journal of Science, Technology, Ethics and Policy 2011;2(1):T5-8
    1. Giordano J. Neurotechnololgy in National Security and Defense: Practical Considerations, Neuroethical Concerns. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2014
    1. Dando M. Neurosciences advances in future warfare. In: Clausen J, Levy N, eds. Handbook of Neuroethics. Dordrecht: Springer; 2014

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources