Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jan 16;73(2):166-174.
doi: 10.1093/gerona/glx105.

Sex Differences in Aging: Genomic Instability

Affiliations
Review

Sex Differences in Aging: Genomic Instability

Kathleen E Fischer et al. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. .

Abstract

Aging is characterized by decreasing physiological integration, reduced function, loss of resilience, and increased risk of death. Paradoxically, although women live longer, they suffer greater morbidity particularly late in life. These sex differences in human lifespan and healthspan are consistently observed in all countries and during every era for which reliable data exist. While these differences are ubiquitous in humans, evidence of sex differences in longevity and health for other species is more equivocal. Among fruit flies, nematodes, and mice, sex differences in lifespan vary depending on strain and treatment. In this review, we focus on sex differences in age-related alterations in DNA damage and mutation rates, telomere attrition, epigenetics, and nuclear architecture. We find that robust sex differences exist, eg, the higher incidence of DNA damage in men compared to women, but sex differences are not often conserved between species. For most mechanisms reviewed here, there are insufficient data to make a clear determination regarding the impact of sex, largely because sex differences have not been analyzed. Overall, our findings reveal an urgent need for well-designed studies that explicitly examine sex differences in molecular drivers of aging.

Keywords: DNA damage; Epigenetics; Gender; Senescence; Telomeres.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. López-Otín C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M, Kroemer G. The hallmarks of aging. Cell. 2013;153:1194–1217. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.039 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kennedy BK, Berger SL, Brunet A et al. Geroscience: linking aging to chronic disease. Cell. 2014;159:709–713. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.039 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vijg J, Suh Y. Genome instability and aging. Annu Rev Physiol. 2013;75:645–668. doi:10.1146/annurev-physiol-030212-183715 - PubMed
    1. Pérez VI, Bokov A, Van Remmen H et al. Is the oxidative stress theory of aging dead?Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1790:1005–1014. doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2009.06.003 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Forsberg LA, Gisselsson D, Dumanski JP. Mosaicism in health and disease - clones picking up speed. Nat Rev Genet. 2017;18:128–142. doi:10.1038/nrg.2016.145 - PubMed

Publication types