Oncology Drug Approvals: Evaluating Endpoints and Evidence in an Era of Breakthrough Therapies
- PMID: 28576856
- PMCID: PMC5507655
- DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0152
Oncology Drug Approvals: Evaluating Endpoints and Evidence in an Era of Breakthrough Therapies
Abstract
With the Breakthrough Therapy Designation program adding to the tools that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has for expediting drug development, the FDA reassessed the endpoints needed for approval of transformative therapies. Although the demonstration of an improvement in overall survival remains the gold standard for drug approval, innovation in cancer research has led to use of other endpoints in regulatory decision‐making. These endpoints include substantially delaying tumor progression or extending progression‐free survival, substantially reducing tumor size for a prolonged time, improving objective response rate and duration of response, or improving cancer‐related symptoms and patient function.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosures of potential conflicts of interest may be found at the end of this article.
Figures
References
-
- Sherman RE, Li J, Shapley S et al. Expediting drug development—The FDA's new “breakthrough therapy” designation. N Engl J Med 2013;369:1877–1880. - PubMed
-
- Shea M, Ostermann L, Hohman R et al. Regulatory Watch: Impact of breakthrough therapy designation on cancer drug development. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2016;15:152. - PubMed
-
- Pazdur R. Endpoints for assessing drug activity in clinical trials. The Oncologist 2008;13:19–21. - PubMed
-
- Hunger SP, Mullighan CG. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children. N Engl J Med 2015;373:1541–1552. - PubMed
-
- Einhorn LH, Donohue J. Cis‐diamminedichloroplatinum, vinblastine, and bleomycin combination chemotherapy in disseminated testicular cancer. Ann Intern Med 1977;87:293–298. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources