Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May 20;14(3):336-339.
doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2017.05.002. eCollection 2017 Sep.

Acute intrapelvic cup migration: advantages of adyuvant Stoppa approach for implant removal/reconstruction. A case report

Antonio Murcia-Asensio  1 , Francisco Ferrero-Manzanal  2 , Raquel Lax-Pérez  1 , Miguel Angel Suárez-Suárez  1   2   3   4 , Emilio José Salmerón-Martínez  1   2   3   4
Affiliations

Acute intrapelvic cup migration: advantages of adyuvant Stoppa approach for implant removal/reconstruction. A case report

Antonio Murcia-Asensio et al. J Orthop. .
No abstract available

Keywords: Fracture fixation; Pelvis; Stoppa approach; Total hip revision.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A: postoperative radiological image with intrapelvic migration of hip prosthesis. B: CT scan image showing the prosthetic protrusion with displacement of intrapelvic structures (arrow).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
A: CT scan 3d reconstruction showing intrapelvic penetration with displacement of lamina quadrilatera. B: intrapelvic removal of double mobility cup. C: intrapelvic image showing th relationship of the prosthetic liner with intrapelvic vascular structures (obturator neurovascular bundle). D: intrapelvic image after restoring the lamina quadrilateral by using the Matta plate.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A: image of the flexible metallic mesh to reinforce the postero-medial wall of the acetabulum. B: image of the acetabulum after impaction of morsellized bone allograft. C: image of the acetabulum after the setting in place of the Delta cup. D: postoperative x-ray.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
schematic representation of the bone deficiency (A) and the reconstruction strategy in the inner (B) and outer (C) aspects of the acetabulum.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Maeckelberg L., Simon J.P., Naudie D., MacDonald S., Corten K. Removal of an intra-pelvic socket: description of a safe surgical algorithm. Acta Orthop Belg. 2012;78:152–158. - PubMed
    1. Barbier O., Pierret C., Bazile F., De Kerangal X., Duverger V., Versier G. Vascular complications following total hip arthroplasty: a case study and a review of the literature. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2012;22(Suppl 1):S121–S125. - PubMed
    1. Isiklar Z., Lindsey R., Tullos H.S. Sciatic neuropathy secondary to intrapelvic migration of an acetabular cup. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1395–1397. - PubMed
    1. Palmer S.W., Luu H.H., Finn H.A. Hip-vagina fistula after acetabular revision. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:533–536. - PubMed
    1. Gani R., Andronikou S., Truter R., Deale J. Protrussio acetabuli prosthetica–a cause of a pelvic mass presenting by the gynaecologist. J Orthop Case Rep. 2012;2:27–28. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources