Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May 31;13(2):178-193.
doi: 10.5964/ejop.v13i2.1238. eCollection 2017 May.

A Cognitive Distortions and Deficits Model of Suicide Ideation

Laura L Fazakas-DeHoog  1   2 , Katerina Rnic  2 , David J A Dozois  2
Affiliations

A Cognitive Distortions and Deficits Model of Suicide Ideation

Laura L Fazakas-DeHoog et al. Eur J Psychol. .

Abstract

Although cognitive distortions and deficits are known risk factors for the development and escalation of suicide ideation and behaviour, no empirical work has examined how these variables interact to predict suicide ideation. The current study proposes an integrative model of cognitive distortions (hopelessness and negative evaluations of self and future) and deficits (problem solving deficits, problem solving avoidance, and cognitive rigidity). To test the integrity of this model, a sample of 397 undergraduate students completed measures of deficits, distortions, and current suicide ideation. A structural equation model demonstrated excellent fit, and findings indicated that only distortions have a direct effect on suicidal thinking, whereas cognitive deficits may exert their effects on suicide ideation via their reciprocal relation with distortions. Findings underscore the importance of both cognitive distortions and deficits for understanding suicidality, which may have implications for preventative efforts and treatment.

Keywords: cognitive deficits; cognitive distortions; hopelessness; suicide; suicide ideation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. SEM statistics for the Modified Cognitive Distortions and Cognitive Deficits Model of Suicidal Thinking.
Note. Suicide Ideation = BSS Total Score; GAS-S = General Attitudes Scale-Self; GAS-F = General Attitudes Scale-Future; BHS = Beck Hopelessness Scale; SPSI-R = Social Problem-Solving Inventory – Rational problem-solving; EFT-mean = Embedded Figures Test-mean time; SPSI-A = Social Problem-solving Inventory-Avoidant problem-solving. *p < .001.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ackerman, R., & DeRubeis, R. J. (1993). The role of cognition in depression. In K. S. Dobson & P. C. Kendall (Eds.), Psychopathology and cognition (pp. 83-119). San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press.
    1. Alloy L. B., Black S. K., Young M. E., Goldstein K. E., Shapero B. G., Stange J. P., et al. Abramson L. Y. (2012). Cognitive vulnerabilities and depression versus other psychopathology symptoms and diagnoses in early adolescence. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 41, 539–560. 10.1080/15374416.2012.703123 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. American College Health Association. (2013). American College Health Association-National College Health Assessment II: Canadian Reference Group Data Report Spring 2013. Hanover, MD, USA: Author.
    1. Ammerman, R. T. (1988). Hopelessness Scale. In M. Mersen (Ed.), Dictionary of behavioral assessment techniques (pp. 251-252). University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA: Pergamon.
    1. Beck A. T., Brown G., Berchick R. J., Stewart B. L., Steer R. A. (1990). The relationship between hopelessness and ultimate suicide: A replication with psychiatric outpatients. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 147, 190–195. 10.1176/ajp.147.2.190 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources