Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar 7;5(9):4404-4412.
doi: 10.1039/c6ta10521a. Epub 2017 Feb 6.

Oxygen-induced doping on reduced PEDOT

Affiliations

Oxygen-induced doping on reduced PEDOT

E Mitraka et al. J Mater Chem A Mater. .

Abstract

The conducting polymer poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) has shown promise as air electrode in renewable energy technologies like metal-air batteries and fuel cells. PEDOT is based on atomic elements of high abundance and is synthesized at low temperature from solution. The mechanism of oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) over chemically polymerized PEDOT:Cl still remains controversial with eventual role of transition metal impurities. However, regardless of the mechanistic route, we here demonstrate yet another key active role of PEDOT in the ORR mechanism. Our study demonstrates the decoupling of conductivity (intrinsic property) from electrocatalysis (as an extrinsic phenomenon) yielding the evidence of doping of the polymer by oxygen during ORR. Hence, the PEDOT electrode is electrochemically reduced (undoped) in the voltage range of ORR regime, but O2 keeps it conducting; ensuring PEDOT to act as an electrode for the ORR. The interaction of oxygen with the polymer electrode is investigated with a battery of spectroscopic techniques.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. (a) Comparing oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in aqueous 0.1 M KCl in N2 and in O2 with Pt in O2. (b) In situ resistometry of a PEDOT:Cl film vs. applied potential in N2 (blue line) and in excess of O2 (light blue line). The curves presented refer to the average resistance of PEDOT:Cl, as this was calculated from the data of the three studied devices. The dashed lines aside the average curves show the fluctuation of the resistance in both N2 and O2 in the low negative potential (<–0.6 V). Nevertheless, the resistance is stable in the potential range –0.6 V to 0.6 V.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. (a) Evolution of conductivity before and after exposure in air (40% RH) and (b) evolution of normalized resistance when O2 is let in the chamber for the pristine PEDOT:Cl film and the films reduced at 0 V, –0.5 V and –0.9 V.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. (a) Absorbance spectra for the pristine PEDOT:Cl sample and the samples reduced at 0 V, –0.5 V and –0.9 V, both in N2 environment and after 60 min exposure to air. (b) Evolution of absorbance at 582 nm versus exposure time in O2 for the pristine sample and for samples reduced at 0 V, –0.5 V and –0.9 V. (c) Normalized absorbance at 582 nm versus normalized resistance change for various exposure times to O2.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. (a) Infrared spectra of pristine and reduced PEDOT:Cl samples under nitrogen atmosphere. The arrows indicate peak position changes from the quinoid (pristine) to the benzoid (reduced at –0.9 V) structures. Further details of the labeled bands can be found in Table 1. (b) Normalized ratio of quinoid and benzoid ring structures, based on normalized intensities of asymmetric CC vibration of quinoid (1528–1514 cm–1) and benzoid (1480–1469 cm–1) structures.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. (a) Infrared spectra of pristine and reduced PEDOT:Cl samples, during the first 2 hours of exposure to oxygen. Green (red) boxes indicate the regions of increasing (decreasing) peak intensity by time, upon exposure to oxygen. (b) Infrared spectra of pristine and reduced PEDOT:Cl samples, followed over a week under exposure to normal atmosphere.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. XPS C(1s), O(1s) and S(2p) spectra for the film reduced at –0.9 V in N2 environment ((a), (d) and (g)) and after 40 min of exposure in air ((b), (e) and (h)), and after 2 weeks ((c), (f), and (i)) respectively.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7. Chemical structures of (a) EDOT, (b) pristine PEDOT (as prepared – oxidized form), (c) reduced PEDOT.

References

    1. Chowdhury A. D., Agnihotri N., Sen P., De A. Electrochim. Acta. 2014;118:81.
    1. Ham D. J., Kim Y. K., Han S. H., Lee J. S. Catal. Today. 2008;132:117.
    1. He D., Cheng K., Li H., Peng T., Xu F., Mu S., Pan M. Langmuir. 2012;28:3979. - PubMed
    1. Yu X., Ye S. J. Power Sources. 2007;172:145.
    1. Bing Y., Liu H., Zhang L., Ghosh D., Zhang J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010;39:2184. - PubMed