Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul;32(7):1181-1186.
doi: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.7.1181.

National Surgical Trends for Distal Radius Fractures in Korea

Affiliations

National Surgical Trends for Distal Radius Fractures in Korea

Young Hoon Jo et al. J Korean Med Sci. 2017 Jul.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate national surgical trends for distal radius fractures (DRFs) in Korea and analyze healthcare institution type-specific surgical trends. We analyzed a nationwide database acquired from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) from 2011 to 2015. International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10) codes and procedure codes were used to identify patients aged ≥ 20 years with newly diagnosed DRFs. A total of 459,388 DRFs occurred from 2011 to 2015. The proportion of DRF cases treated by surgery tended to increase over time, from 32.6% in 2011 to 38.3% in 2015 (P < 0.001). Open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF) using a plate steadily gained in popularity each year, increasing from 39.2% of overall surgeries in 2011 to 60.9% in 2015. The type of surgery for DRFs differed depending on the type of healthcare institution. ORIF (91%) was the most popular procedure in tertiary hospitals, whereas percutaneous pinning (58%) was most popular in clinics. In addition, general hospitals and hospitals with 30-100 beds used external fixation more frequently than tertiary hospitals and clinics did. Overall, our findings indicate that surgical treatment of DRF, particularly ORIF, continues to increase, and that the component ratio of operation codes differed according to the healthcare institution type.

Keywords: Distal Radius Fracture; Epidemiology; Surgery; Trend.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Proportion of surgical treatment in patients with DRFs, by year. DRF = distal radius fracture.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Proportion of operation type in patients with DRFs, by year. DRF = distal radius fracture, ORIF = open reduction with internal fixation.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Proportion of DRFs patients who underwent surgical treatment, by health care institution type. DRF = distal radius fracture.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Proportion of operation type in patients with DRFs, by health care institution type. DRF = distal radius fracture, ORIF = open reduction with internal fixation.

References

    1. Mattila VM, Huttunen TT, Sillanpää P, Niemi S, Pihlajamäki H, Kannus P. Significant change in the surgical treatment of distal radius fractures: a nationwide study between 1998 and 2008 in Finland. J Trauma. 2011;71:939–942. - PubMed
    1. Oinuma T, Sakuma M, Endo N. Secular change of the incidence of four fracture types associated with senile osteoporosis in Sado, Japan: the results of a 3-year survey. J Bone Miner Metab. 2010;28:55–59. - PubMed
    1. Kwon GD, Jang S, Lee A, Park CM, Lee YK, Kim TY, Kim HY, Park EJ, Ha YC. Incidence and mortality after distal radius fractures in adults aged 50 years and older in Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2016;31:630–634. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury. 2006;37:691–697. - PubMed
    1. Chung KC, Spilson SV. The frequency and epidemiology of hand and forearm fractures in the United States. J Hand Surg Am. 2001;26:908–915. - PubMed