Technologies to Support Community-Dwelling Persons With Dementia: A Position Paper on Issues Regarding Development, Usability, Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness, Deployment, and Ethics
- PMID: 28582262
- PMCID: PMC5454557
- DOI: 10.2196/rehab.6376
Technologies to Support Community-Dwelling Persons With Dementia: A Position Paper on Issues Regarding Development, Usability, Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness, Deployment, and Ethics
Abstract
Background: With the expected increase in the numbers of persons with dementia, providing timely, adequate, and affordable care and support is challenging. Assistive and health technologies may be a valuable contribution in dementia care, but new challenges may emerge.
Objective: The aim of our study was to review the state of the art of technologies for persons with dementia regarding issues on development, usability, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, deployment, and ethics in 3 fields of application of technologies: (1) support with managing everyday life, (2) support with participating in pleasurable and meaningful activities, and (3) support with dementia health and social care provision. The study also aimed to identify gaps in the evidence and challenges for future research.
Methods: Reviews of literature and expert opinions were used in our study. Literature searches were conducted on usability, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and ethics using PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases with no time limit. Selection criteria in our selected technology fields were reviews in English for community-dwelling persons with dementia. Regarding deployment issues, searches were done in Health Technology Assessment databases.
Results: According to our results, persons with dementia want to be included in the development of technologies; there is little research on the usability of assistive technologies; various benefits are reported but are mainly based on low-quality studies; barriers to deployment of technologies in dementia care were identified, and ethical issues were raised by researchers but often not studied. Many challenges remain such as including the target group more often in development, performing more high-quality studies on usability and effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, creating and having access to high-quality datasets on existing technologies to enable adequate deployment of technologies in dementia care, and ensuring that ethical issues are considered an important topic for researchers to include in their evaluation of assistive technologies.
Conclusions: Based on these findings, various actions are recommended for development, usability, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, deployment, and ethics of assistive and health technologies across Europe. These include avoiding replication of technology development that is unhelpful or ineffective and focusing on how technologies succeed in addressing individual needs of persons with dementia. Furthermore, it is suggested to include these recommendations in national and international calls for funding and assistive technology research programs. Finally, practitioners, policy makers, care insurers, and care providers should work together with technology enterprises and researchers to prepare strategies for the implementation of assistive technologies in different care settings. This may help future generations of persons with dementia to utilize available and affordable technologies and, ultimately, to benefit from them.
Keywords: dementia; diffusion of innovation; ethics; evaluation studies; technology.
©Franka Meiland, Anthea Innes, Gail Mountain, Louise Robinson, Henriëtte van der Roest, J Antonio García-Casal, Dianne Gove, Jochen René Thyrian, Shirley Evans, Rose-Marie Dröes, Fiona Kelly, Alexander Kurz, Dympna Casey, Dorota Szcześniak, Tom Dening, Michael P Craven, Marijke Span, Heike Felzmann, Magda Tsolaki, Manuel Franco-Martin. Originally published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology (http://rehab.jmir.org), 16.01.2017.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Figures
References
-
- Prince M, Albanese E, Guerchet M, Prina M. Alz.co. London, UK: Alzheimer's Disease International; 2014. World Alzheimer's Report 2014: Dementia and Risk Reduction: An analysis of protective and modifiable factors https://www.alz.co.uk/research/WorldAlzheimerReport2014.pdf 6n4mbNcgX.
-
- Prince M, Wimo A, Guerchet M, All G, Wu Y, Prina M. Alz.co. London, UK: Alzheimer's Disease International; 2015. World Alzheimer's Report 2015: The Global Impact of Dementia: An analysis of prevalence, incidence, cost and trends http://www.alz.co.uk/research/WorldAlzheimerReport2015.pdf 6n4msmO3n.
-
- Prince M, Prina M, Guerchet M. Alz.co. London, UK: Alzheimer's Disease International; 2013. [2016-12-28]. World Alzheimer's Report 2013: Journey of Caring: An analysis of long-term care for dementia https://www.alz.co.uk/research/WorldAlzheimerReport2013.pdf 6n4nG6Z9x.
-
- Prince M, Bryce R, Ferri C. Alz.co. London, UK: Alzheimer's Disease International; 2011. [2016-10-12]. World Alzheimer's Report 2011: The benefits of early diagnosis and intervention http://www.alz.co.uk/research/WorldAlzheimerReport2011.pdf 6lBbNqxOb.
-
- Marshall M. State of the art in dementia care. London, UK: Centre For Policy on Ageing; 1997.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources