Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Sep-Oct;13(5):997-1003.
doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.05.015. Epub 2017 May 27.

The TOronto ThromboProphylaxis Patient Safety Initiative (TOPPS): A cluster randomised trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The TOronto ThromboProphylaxis Patient Safety Initiative (TOPPS): A cluster randomised trial

Artemis Diamantouros et al. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2017 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Background: Although venous thromboembolism (VTE) is one of the most common and most preventable complications of hospital stay, review of the literature demonstrates large evidence-care gaps for VTE prevention.

Objectives: This study aimed to determine if a multi-component quality improvement (QI) strategy, including the support of hospital leadership, use of order sets, audit and feedback, and active pharmacy involvement, could increase the use of appropriate thromboprophylaxis in patients hospitalized for hip fracture surgery (HFS), major general surgery (MGS) and acute medical illness (MED).

Methods: TOPPS was a cluster randomized trial involving eight hospitals. After a baseline data collection phase, one of the three patient groups at each site was randomized to the targeted QI intervention while the other two groups served as controls. In the next phase, an additional patient group at each site was randomized to the intervention while the third group remained controls. Standardized chart audits were conducted to assess the rates of appropriate thromboprophylaxis use.

Results: At baseline, the rates of appropriate thromboprophylaxis were 79% in HFS, 43% in MGS and 31% in MED. By the end of phase 3, 89% of HFS, 65% of MGS and 70% of MED patients were receiving appropriate prophylaxis. Improvement was greater in the intervention groups compared to controls (85% vs. 76% in HFS; 67% vs. 54% in MGS; 64% vs. 62% in MED) and this difference reached significance in the MGS group (p = 0.048).

Conclusions: Use of a multi-component intervention can be effective in improving the appropriate use of thromboprophylaxis.

Keywords: Implementation science; Knowledge translation; Pharmacy; Quality improvement; Thromboprophylaxis; Venous thromboembolism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources