Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun 5;189(22):E764-E772.
doi: 10.1503/cmaj.161156.

Perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality after attempted operative vaginal delivery at midpelvic station

Affiliations

Perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality after attempted operative vaginal delivery at midpelvic station

Giulia M Muraca et al. CMAJ. .

Abstract

Background: Increased use of operative vaginal delivery (i.e., forceps or vacuum application), of which 20% occurs at midpelvic station, has been advocated to reduce the rate of cesarean delivery. We aimed to quantify severe perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality associated with attempted midpelvic operative vaginal delivery.

Methods: We studied all term singleton deliveries in Canada between 2003 and 2013, by attempted midpelvic operative vaginal or cesarean delivery with labour (with and without prolonged second stage). The primary outcomes were composite severe perinatal morbidity and mortality (e.g., convulsions, assisted ventilation, severe birth trauma and perinatal death), and composite severe maternal morbidity and mortality (e.g., severe postpartum hemorrhage, shock, sepsis, cardiac complications, acute renal failure and death).

Results: The study population included 187 234 deliveries. Among women with dystocia and prolonged second stage of labour, midpelvic operative vaginal delivery was associated with higher rates of severe perinatal morbidity and mortality compared with cesarean delivery (forceps, adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24 to 2.64; vacuum, AOR 1.81, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.80; sequential instruments, AOR 3.19, 95% CI 1.73 to 5.88), especially with higher rates of severe birth trauma. Rates of severe maternal morbidity and mortality were not significantly different after operative vaginal delivery, although rates of obstetric trauma were higher (forceps, AOR 4.51, 95% CI 4.04 to 5.02; vacuum, AOR 2.70, 95% CI 2.35 to 3.09; sequential instruments, AOR 4.24, 95% CI 3.46 to 5.19). Among women with fetal distress, similar associations were seen for severe birth trauma and obstetric trauma, although vacuum was associated with lower rates of severe maternal morbidity and mortality (AOR 0.52, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.80). Associations tended to be stronger among women without a prolonged second stage.

Interpretation: Midpelvic operative vaginal delivery is associated with higher rates of severe birth trauma and obstetric trauma, whereas overall rates of severe perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality vary by indication and operative instrument.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Derivation of the cohort for this study. The sum of individual exclusions may exceed the total at each point because some deliveries were excluded for multiple reasons. *Excluding Quebec. †Midpelvic OVD v. cesarean delivery indicated for dystocia. ‡Midpelvic OVD v. cesarean delivery indicated for fetal distress. OVD = operative vaginal delivery.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Effects of midpelvic operative vaginal delivery (compared with cesarean delivery in labour) on composite severe perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality, and trauma among women with and without a prolonged second stage of labour. (A) Women with dystocia and (B) women with fetal distress. AOR = adjusted odds ratio, CI = confidence interval.

Comment in

References

    1. Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, et al., editors. Operative vaginal delivery. In: Williams obstetrics. 24th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2014.
    1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice Bulletin No. 154: Operative vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2015;126:e56–65. - PubMed
    1. Alexander JM, Leveno KJ, Hauth J, et al. Fetal injury associated with cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:885–90. - PubMed
    1. Alexander JM, Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ, et al. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:917–21. - PubMed
    1. Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, et al. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014;210:179–93. - PubMed